Cited by 68Cholesterol and Lipid MetabolismCellular transport and secretionLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 30 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The LXR-IDOL axis defines a clathrin-, caveolae-, and dynamin-independent endocytic route for LDLR internalization and lysosomal degradation

Open access

Abstract

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is taken up into cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the LDL receptor (LDLR). Following dissociation of the LDLR-LDL complex, LDL is directed to lysosomes whereas the LDLR recycles to the plasma membrane. Activation of the sterol-sensing nuclear receptors liver X receptors (LXRs) enhances degradation of the LDLR. This depends on the LXR target gene inducible degrader of the LDLR (IDOL), an E3-ubiquitin ligase that promotes ubiquitylation and lysosomal degradation of the LDLR. How ubiquitylation of the LDLR by IDOL controls its endocytic trafficking is currently unknown. Using genetic- and pharmacological-based approaches coupled to functional assessment of LDL uptake, we show that the LXR-IDOL axis targets a LDLR pool present in lipid rafts. IDOL-dependent internalization of the LDLR is independent of clathrin, caveolin, macroautophagy, and dynamin. Rather, it depends on the endocytic protein epsin. Consistent with LDLR ubiquitylation acting as a sorting signal, degradation of the receptor can be blocked by perturbing the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) or by USP8, a deubiquitylase implicated in sorting ubiquitylated cargo to multivesicular bodies. In summary, we provide evidence for the existence of an LXR-IDOL-mediated internalization pathway for the LDLR that is distinct from that used for lipoprotein uptake.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The LXR-IDOL axis promotes internalization and lysosomal degradation of a lipid-raft LDLR pool through a route independent of clathrin, caveolae, dynamin, and macroautophagy, but dependent on epsin/ubiquitin adaptors and ESCRT-mediated sorting. This IDOL route is distinct from the clathrin-dependent LDLR pathway used for LDL uptake.

Key findings

  • LXR activation with GW3965 reduces total and cell-surface LDLR; lysosomotropic agents bafilomycin A1 or NH4Cl block total LDLR degradation but do not rescue surface LDLR, suggesting IDOL targets plasma membrane LDLR and impedes recycling (surface LDLR set to 100% in sterol-depletion medium; n = 6; P < 0.01).
  • IDOL-mediated LDLR degradation persists despite >90% clathrin heavy chain knockdown, in Cav1−/− and Atg5−/− fibroblasts, with dynasore, and with DNM1/DNM2 siRNA, while LDL uptake is severely diminished under clathrin knockdown or dynasore. ARH silencing reduced ARH mRNA by 90 ± 4% and LDL uptake to 57 ± 8% of control (n = 3, P < 0.01) but did not prevent LXR-stimulated LDLR degradation; LDLR Y828C was also degraded.
  • IDOL targets a lipid-raft LDLR pool: in HepG2 cells most LDLR was in low-density fractions enriched in Flotillin1 and Caveolin1 and largely devoid of clathrin; MβCD and filipin blocked IDOL-mediated degradation, though MβCD also inhibited LDL uptake by 27 ± 5% (n = 3, P < 0.05).
  • Epsin1 overexpression blocked IDOL-mediated degradation of LDLR and VLDLR and led to accumulation of ubiquitylated receptor; TSG101 silencing, dominant-negative VPS4 E228Q, and USP8 blocked LDLR degradation, whereas AMSH did not.

Methods

  • Cell-based genetic and pharmacological study using HEK293T, HeLa, HepG2, A431, human fibroblasts reconstituted with WT or Y828C LDLR, Cav1−/− and Atg5−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts, and doxycycline-inducible CHC-knockdown HeLa cells; cells were sterol-depleted and treated with GW3965, bafilomycin A1, NH4Cl, dynasore, MβCD, or filipin as indicated.
  • Main assays included FACS measurement of cell-surface LDLR, DyLight 488-labeled LDL uptake, immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence for transferrin/clathrin, sucrose-gradient membrane fractionation, and quantitative PCR; statistical differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA with P < 0.05 considered significant.
  • Perturbations included siRNA against ARH, TSG101, DNM1, and DNM2, and expression of IDOL, LDLR, Epsin1, VPS4 WT/E228Q, AMSH, and USP8 constructs.

Limitations

  • Stated: current IDOL antibodies, including those developed by the authors and commercial ones, cannot detect endogenous IDOL protein, preventing critical testing of whether lipid rafts recruit IDOL for LDLR downregulation.
  • Stated: Epsin1 silencing alone did not block IDOL-mediated LDLR degradation, likely due to functional redundancy with related ubiquitin adaptors such as Eps15/Eps15R; the authors note preliminary EPS15/EPS15R knockdown data and that the study was not specifically geared toward addressing Epsin1’s role in LDL uptake.
  • Stated/evident: the authors report a discrepancy with Scotti et al. regarding lipid rafts, with filipin used at 10 μg/ml versus 1 μg/ml; many mechanistic conclusions rely on overexpression or dominant-negative constructs and pharmacological inhibitors, some immunoblots are representative of only two independent experiments, and no in vivo model is presented.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1194/jlr.m037713

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

10 of 30 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation
    § RESULTS

    Epsin1 over-expression blocks IDOL-mediated degradation of the VLDL receptor (VLDLR).

    “Similarly, Epsin1 over-expression also blocked degradation of another IDOL target, the VLDL receptor (VLDLR ) (supplementary Fig. V) ( 30 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Hong, 2010, The E3 ubiquitin ligase IDOL induces the degradation of the low density lipoprotein receptor family members VLDLR and ApoER2, J. Biol. Chem. source

      The Results (page unavailable) show that IDOL reduces VLDLR protein levels, supporting the description of VLDLR as an IDOL target. The cited paper does not report Epsin1 over-expression blocking that degradation; a search for Epsin1 found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § The LXR-IDOL axis defi nes a clathrin-, caveolae -, and dynamin-independent endocytic route for LDLR internalization and lysosomal degradation

    This LXR-dependent degradation of LDLR depends on IDOL, an E3-ubiquitin ligase that promotes ubiquitylation and lysosomal degradation of the LDLR.

    “This depends on the LXR target gene inducible degrader of the LDLR (IDOL), an E3-ubiquitin ligase that promotes ubiquitylation and lysosomal degradation of the LDLR.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [21] Zelcer, 2009, LXR regulates cholesterol uptake through Idol-dependent ubiquitination of the LDL receptor, Science. source
    • cites [22] Sorrentino, 2011, Distinct functional domains contribute to degradation of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) by the E3 ubiquitin ligase inducible degrader of the LDLR (IDOL), J. Biol. Chem. source
  • Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    IDOL stimulates poly-K63 ubiquitylation of the LDLR.

    “This fi nding is consistent with our earlier report that IDOL stimulates poly-K63 ubiquitylation of the LDLR, a known lysosomal targeting tag for membrane receptors ( 22 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Sorrentino, 2011, Distinct functional domains contribute to degradation of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) by the E3 ubiquitin ligase inducible degrader of the LDLR (IDOL), J. Biol. Chem. source
  • Premisecitation
    § The LXR-IDOL axis defi nes a clathrin-, caveolae -, and dynamin-independent endocytic route for LDLR internalization and lysosomal degradation

    Activation of LXRs enhances degradation of the LDLR.

    “Activation of the sterol-sensing nuclear receptors liver X receptors (LXRs) enhances degradation of the LDLR .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [19] Zelcer, 2006, Liver X receptors as integrators of metabolic and inflammatory signaling, J. Clin. Invest. source

      The sections on whole-body cholesterol homeostasis and macrophage cholesterol metabolism describe LXR-driven cholesterol transport and efflux, but not LDLR degradation. A search for LDLR and LDL-receptor degradation found only references to LDLR-deficient mice in the atherosclerosis section, not evidence that LXR activation enhances degradation of the receptor. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [20] Janowski, 1996, An oxysterol signalling pathway mediated by the nuclear receptor LXR alpha, Nature. source
    • cites [21] Zelcer, 2009, LXR regulates cholesterol uptake through Idol-dependent ubiquitination of the LDL receptor, Science. source
  • Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The ESCRT system is required for sorting of ubiquitylated LDLR.

    “Fig. 8. The ESCRT system is required for sorting of ubiquitylated LDLR.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
      “Our study also illustrates the role of the ESCRT system in sorting ubiquitylated LDLR toward MVBs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 12
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Whereas the LDLR is degraded in the lysosome, IDOL is subject to proteasomal breakdown.

    “We think that this is unlikely, as we previously reported that whereas the LDLR is degraded in the lysosome, IDOL is subject to proteasomal breakdown ( 21 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Zelcer, 2009, LXR regulates cholesterol uptake through Idol-dependent ubiquitination of the LDL receptor, Science. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    The PCSK9 route does not require ESCRT-mediated sorting and is a clathrin-dependent process that capitalizes on the same cellular machinery used for LDL endocytosis.

    “In contrast to IDOL-stimulated degradation of the LDLR, the PCSK9 route does not require ESCRT-mediated sorting and is a clathrin-dependent process that capitalizes on the same cellular machinery used for LDL endocytosis ( 55 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55] Wang, 2012, Molecular characterization of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9-mediated degradation of the LDLR, J. Lipid Res. source

      The Results section ('PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation requires clathrin-mediated endocytosis') says the PCSK9–LDLR complex uses the same endocytic machinery that imports LDL. The ESCRT Results section says degradation does not require the first ESCRT components tested, but explicitly allows that the complex may enter the pathway downstream. The claim overstates that qualified finding as independence from ESCRT-mediated sorting altogether. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Signaling and internalization of receptors largely depends on recruitment of specific adaptor proteins, including ubiquitin-ligases and epsins.

    “Signaling and internalization of receptors largely depends on recruitment of specifi c adaptor proteins, including ubiquitin-ligases and epsins ( 13, 14, 46 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [13] Sigismund, 2012, Endocytosis and signaling: cell logistics shape the eukaryotic cell plan, Physiol. Rev. source

      In “Ligand-Induced Ubiquitination of Adaptors” (page unavailable), the review says endocytic adaptors play a critical role in receptor internalization and identifies epsin-1 as an endocytic protein involved in adaptor ubiquitination. “Ligand-Induced Ubiquitination of Cargo” describes adaptors recruiting E3 ubiquitin ligases to receptors, rather than identifying the ligases themselves as adaptor proteins. The review supports the importance of these proteins in the pathways discussed, but not the claim’s classification of ubiquitin ligases as adaptors. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [14] MacGurn, 2012, Ubiquitin and membrane protein turnover: from cradle to grave, Annu. Rev. Biochem. source
    • cites [46] Lafont, 2001, Raft-partitioning of the ubiquitin ligases Cbl and Nedd4 upon IgE-triggered cell signaling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    IDOL and PCSK9 represent major posttranscriptional pathways that promote LDLR degradation, and these pathways represent distinct routes for LDLR degradation.

    “IDOL and PCSK9 represent the major posttranscriptional pathways that promote LDLR degradation, and as previously suggested these pathways represent distinct routes for LDLR degradation ( 23, 54 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] Sorrentino, 2012, Post-transcriptional regulation of lipoprotein receptors by the E3-ubiquitin ligase inducible degrader of the low-density lipoprotein receptor, Curr. Opin. Lipidol. source
    • cites [54] Scotti, 2011, Targeted disruption of the idol gene alters cellular regulation of the low-density lipoprotein receptor by sterols and liver x receptor agonists, Mol. Cell. Biol. source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    IDOL-dependent internalization of the LDLR is independent of clathrin.

    “IDOL-mediated degradation of the LDLR is clathrin independent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    Bafilomycin A1 attenuates IDOL-mediated degradation of the LDLR but does not lead to parallel stabilization of IDOL.

    “Furthermore, the lysosomotropic agent bafi lomycin A1, which attenuates IDOL-mediated degradation of the LDLR, does not lead to parallel stabilization of IDOL (not shown).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    IDOL-dependent internalization of the LDLR is independent of caveolin.

    “Degradation of the LDLR by IDOL is independent of caveolin and macroautophagy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data
    § RESULTS

    Expression of a mutant VPS4 E228Q form in HEK293T cells abolishes degradation of the LDLR by IDOL, while WT VPS4 has no effect.

    “Accordingly, expression of a mutant VPS4 E228Q form in HEK293T cells abolished degradation of the LDLR by IDOL ( Fig. 8B ), while WT VPS4 had no effect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    EPS15 and EPS15R are involved in IDOL-mediated internalization of ubiquitylated LDLR.

    “Our preliminary results rather suggest that EPS15 and EPS15R are involved in this process and studies to elucidate the critical role of these ubiquitin-adaptors as downstream effectors of ubiquitylated LDLR sorting are ongoing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    USP8 can break down both K48- and K63-linked ubiquitin chains and can remove attached ubiquitin from cargo as well as modify the ubiquitylation state of ESCRT components.

    “USP8 can break down both K48- and K63-linked ubiquitin chains and can remove attached ubiquitin from cargo as well as modify the ubiquitylation state of ESCRT components ( 45 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Clague, 2006, Endocytosis: the DUB version, Trends Cell Biol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § The LXR-IDOL axis defi nes a clathrin-, caveolae -, and dynamin-independent endocytic route for LDLR internalization and lysosomal degradation

    LDL is taken up into cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the LDL receptor (LDLR).

    “Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is taken up into cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the LDL receptor (LDLR).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] Brown, 1986, A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis, Science. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Silencing of EPN1 in monkey BSC-1 cells prevents entry of the influenza virus via clathrin-dependent endocytosis, but internalization of LDL or transferrin in these cells via the same pathway remains unchanged.

    “For example, while silencing of EPN1 (EPSIN1) in monkey BSC-1 cells prevents entry of the infl uenza virus via clathrin-dependent endocytosis, internalization of LDL or transferrin in these cells via the same pathway remains unchanged ( 50 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] Chen, 2008, Epsin 1 is a cargo-specific adaptor for the clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the influenza virus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Scotti et al. reported findings similar to those reported here.

    “While completing our study, Scotti et al. ( 56 ) reported fi ndings similar to those reported here.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] Scotti, 2013, IDOL stimulates clathrin-independent endocytosis and multivesicular body-mediated lysosomal degradation of the low-density lipoprotein receptor, Mol. Cell. Biol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Unless otherwise indicated, all immunoblots shown are representative of at least three independent experiments with similar results.

    “Unless otherwise indicated, all immunoblots shown are representative of at least three independent experiments with similar results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Lipid rafts are dynamic microdomains consisting of cholesterol and sphingolipids in the plasma membrane.

    “Lipid rafts are dynamic microdomains consisting of cholesterol and sphingolipids in the plasma membrane ( 36 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Simons, 2000, Lipid rafts and signal transduction, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § DISCUSSION

    IDOL-mediated internalization of the LDLR requires epsins and subsequent sorting by the ESCRT system.

    “Instead, we propose that IDOL-mediated internalization of the LDLR requires epsins and subsequent sorting by the ESCRT system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Functional coupling of target ubiquitylation and degradation to that of the cognate E3-ubiquitin ligase is an emerging concept in the ubiquitin field.

    “Functional coupling of target ubiquitylation and degradation to that of the cognate E3-ubiquitin ligase is an emerging concept in the ubiquitin fi eld ( 53 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] de Bie, 2011, Ubiquitination of E3 ligases: self-regulation of the ubiquitin system via proteolytic and non-proteolytic mechanisms, Cell Death Differ. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Epsins are a class of ubiquitin adaptors implicated in internalization and sorting of plasma membrane receptors.

    “Epsins are a class of ubiquitin adaptors that are implicated in internalization and sorting of plasma membrane receptors ( 39, 40, 47 ), and are implicated in tuning, among other, EGFR ( 27, 38 ), Notch ( 48 ), and VEFGR2 signaling ( 49 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [39] Polo, 2002, A single motif responsible for ubiquitin recognition and monoubiquitination in endocytic proteins, Nature. source
    • cites [40] Wendland, 2002, Epsins: adaptors in endocytosis?, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. source
    • cites [47] Horvath, 2007, Epsin: inducing membrane curvature, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data
    § RESULTS

    IDOL-dependent degradation of the LDLR emanates from lipid rafts and requires ubiquitylation and subsequent initial sorting by epsins that is followed by ESCRT-dependent sorting into MVBs.

    “Overall, our experiments propose that IDOL-dependent degradation of the LDLR emanates from lipid rafts and requires ubiquitylation and subsequent initial sorting by epsins that is followed by ESCRT-dependent sorting into MVBs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Disrupting lipid raft integrity, e.g., with MβCD or filipin, perturbs cell-signaling and protein-interaction networks.

    “Moreover, disrupting lipid raft integrity, e.g., with M 𝛃 CD or fi lipin, perturbs cell-signaling and protein-interaction networks ( 36 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Simons, 2000, Lipid rafts and signal transduction, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Plasmids and expression constructs

    DNA sequencing was used to verify the correctness of all constructs used in this study.

    “DNA sequencing was used to verify the correctness of all the constructs used in this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Both studies demonstrate that IDOL-stimulated internalization of the LDLR is clathrin-, caveolae-, and dynamin-independent, and identify the ESCRT system and associated DUB USP8 as important determinants for sorting ubiquitylated LDLR to MVBs.

    “Both studies, using different methodologies, demonstrate that IDOL-stimulated internalization of the LDLR is clathrin-, caveolae-, and dynamin-independent, and identify the ESCRT system and associated DUB USP8 as important determinants for sorting ubiquitylated LDLR to MVBs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] Scotti, 2013, IDOL stimulates clathrin-independent endocytosis and multivesicular body-mediated lysosomal degradation of the low-density lipoprotein receptor, Mol. Cell. Biol. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation
    § The LXR-IDOL axis defi nes a clathrin-, caveolae -, and dynamin-independent endocytic route for LDLR internalization and lysosomal degradation

    Following dissociation of the LDLR-LDL complex, LDL is directed to lysosomes whereas the LDLR recycles to the plasma membrane.

    “Following dissociation of the LDLR-LDL complex, LDL is directed to lysosomes whereas the LDLR recycles to the plasma membrane.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] Brown, 1986, A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis, Science. source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § RESULTS

    By promoting LDLR ubiquitylation, the LXR-IDOL pathway targets the plasma membrane LDLR for lysosomal degradation and impedes receptor recycling.

    “Therefore, our observations suggest that by promoting LDLR ubiquitylation, the LXR-IDOL pathway targets the plasma membrane LDLR for lysosomal degradation and impedes receptor recycling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § siRNA interference experiments

    Silencing of target genes was assessed by quantitative PCR or Western blotting.

    “Silencing of target genes was assessed by quantitative PCR or Western blotting.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
25 of 25
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The chemical dynasore is an inhibitor of dynamin-dependent processes.

    “The chemical dynasore is an inhibitor of dynamin-dependent processes”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Epsin1 silencing failure to block IDOL degradation is due to functional redundancy with other related ubiquitin adaptors like Eps15 and Eps15R.

    “most likely pointing to functional redundancy with other related ubiquitin adaptors like Eps15 and Eps15R”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sorrentino, V., Nelson, J. K., Maspero, E., Marques, A. R. A., Scheer, L., Polo, S., & Zelcer, N.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • IFOM (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Zelcer, Noam
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
54
Issue
8
Pages
2174-2184
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110245801
Cited by
68
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Lipid Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
LDL receptor, liver X receptor, idols, LDL cholesterol uptake, receptor internalization, lysosomal degradation, ubiquitination, epsin, ESCRT, USP8, lipid rafts, endosomal trafficking, caveolae, dynamin-independent endocytosis, macroautophagy
MeSH terms
Liver X Receptors, Cells, Cultured, Clathrin, Endocytosis, HeLa Cells, Humans, Lysosomes, Receptors, LDL, Caveolae, Dynamins, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Hep G2 Cells, Orphan Nuclear Receptors, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review