Cited by 77Ovarian function and disordersSexual Differentiation and DisordersGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

Current concepts of polycystic ovary syndrome pathogenesis

Open access
Rosenfield, Robert L.·2020·Current Opinion in Pediatrics

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review provides a model for understanding polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) pathophysiology and updates the evidence on which it is based. Then, it highlights complimentary molecular genetic and epigenetic advances in understanding PCOS cause. Recent findings: Important studies into PCOS cause built on the 2014 discovery of a novel regulatory protein variant that underlies the typical PCOS steroidogenic abnormalities: DENND1A.V2 (differentially expressed in normal and neoplastic development, isoform 1A, variant 2). Over 30 DENND1A gene variants have been found, the vast majority upstream of the coding sequence and potentially regulatory. These variants are individually uncommon but collectively plausibly cause 50% of PCOS. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)/AMH receptor variants with decreased function possibly cause 6.7% of PCOS. DENNND1A was recently reported to belong to a signaling network that upregulates luteinizing hormone receptor expression and insulin mitogenic signaling. Prenatal androgen administration has proven to be a potent epigenetic regulator that causes transgenerational epigenomic changes in a mouse PCOS model with similarities to those in human PCOS and PCOS daughters. Summary: In addition to finding how gene variants contribute to PCOS pathogenesis, better understanding of androgen epigenetic mechanisms of action in diverse tissues can be expected to expand our understanding of PCOS pathogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mop.0000000000000945

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compensatory hyperinsulinemia caused by insulin resistance may lead to excessive activation of IGF-1 and directly stimulate theca cells to produce androgens, exacerbating hyperandrogenism and inhibiting follicular development and ovulation.

    “Additionally, compensatory hyperinsulinemia caused by IR may lead to excessive activation of IGF-1 and it can directly stimulate theca cells to produce androgens, exacerbating hyperandrogenism and inhibiting follicular development and ovulation, thus worsening the symptoms associated with PCOS15,16.”

    From Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists on weight management and metabolic parameters in PCOS women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The PCOS Pathophysiology section, under “Insulin-resistant hyperinsulinism” (page not provided), says compensatory hyperinsulinemia increases thecal LH receptors and CYP17 activity, aggravates ovarian hyperandrogenism, and disrupts follicle maturation and ovulation. It does not describe excessive IGF-1 activation or say that insulin directly stimulates theca cells to produce androgens; those specific mechanisms are unsupported by this copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenfield, R. L.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenfield, Robert L.
Venue
Current Opinion in Pediatrics
Published
2020-09-03
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
698-706
ISSN
  • 1040-8703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-698X
OpenAlex
W3083316467
Cited by
77
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024999, M01RR000055)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD041859)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, PCOS pathogenesis, DENND1A, anti-Müllerian hormone, luteinizing hormone receptor, insulin signaling, prenatal androgen exposure, transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, epigenetics, genetic variants
MeSH terms
Androgens, Female, Humans, Insulin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Signal Transduction, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, Death Domain Receptor Signaling Adaptor Proteins, Anti-Mullerian Hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review