Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

American Pancreatic Association Practice Guidelines in Chronic Pancreatitis: Evidence-Based Report on Diagnostic Guidelines

Open access
Conwell, Darwin L., Lee, Linda S., Yadav, Dhiraj, Longnecker, Daniel S., Miller, Frank H., Mortele, Koenraad J., Levy, Michael J., Kwon, Richard, Lieb, John G., Stevens, Tyler, Toskes, Phillip P., Gardner, Timothy B., Gelrud, Andres, Wu, Bechien U., Forsmark, Christopher E., Vege, Santhi S.·2014·Pancreas

Abstract

The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis remains challenging in early stages of the disease. This report defines the diagnostic criteria useful in the assessment of patients with suspected and established chronic pancreatitis. All current diagnostic procedures are reviewed, and evidence-based statements are provided about their utility and limitations. Diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis are classified as definitive, probable, or insufficient evidence. A diagnostic (STEP-wise; survey, tomography, endoscopy, and pancreas function testing) algorithm is proposed that proceeds from a noninvasive to a more invasive approach. This algorithm maximizes specificity (low false-positive rate) in subjects with chronic abdominal pain and equivocal imaging changes. Furthermore, a nomenclature is suggested to further characterize patients with established chronic pancreatitis based on TIGAR-O (toxic, idiopathic, genetic, autoimmune, recurrent, and obstructive) etiology, gland morphology (Cambridge criteria), and physiologic state (exocrine, endocrine function) for uniformity across future multicenter research collaborations. This guideline will serve as a baseline manuscript that will be modified as new evidence becomes available and our knowledge of chronic pancreatitis improves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000237

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Conwell, D. L., Lee, L. S., Yadav, D., Longnecker, D. S., Miller, F. H., Mortele, K. J., Levy, M. J., Kwon, R., Lieb, J. G., Stevens, T., Toskes, P. P., Gardner, T. B., Gelrud, A., Wu, B. U., Forsmark, C. E., & Vege, S. S.
Venue
Pancreas
Published
2014-11
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
1143-1162
ISSN
0885-3177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053302654
Cited by
422
References
92
FWCI
26.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American Pancreatic Association Practice Guidelines in Chronic Pancreatitis: Evidence-Based Report on Diagnostic Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000237
The paper
Conwell, D. L., Lee, L. S., Yadav, D., Longnecker, D. S., Miller, F. H., Mortele, K. J., Levy, M. J., Kwon, R., Lieb, J. G., Stevens, T., Toskes, P. P., Gardner, T. B., Gelrud, A., Wu, B. U., Forsmark, C. E., & Vege, S. S. (2014). American Pancreatic Association Practice Guidelines in Chronic Pancreatitis: Evidence-Based Report on Diagnostic Guidelines. Pancreas. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000237

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.