Cited by 14Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Depersonalization in Patients With Persecutory Delusions

Černis, Emma, Dunn, Graham, Startup, Helen, Kingdon, David, Wingham, Gail, Pugh, Katherine, Cordwell, Jacinta, Mander, Helen +1 more·2014·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

Delusions are, in part, attempts to explain confusing anomalous experience. Depersonalization, a key subset of anomalous experience, has been little studied in relation to persecutory delusions. The aims of this study were to assess the presence of depersonalization in patients with persecutory delusions and to examine associations with levels of paranoia and worry. Fifty patients with a current persecutory delusion completed measures of depersonalization, psychotic symptoms, and worry. Depersonalization experiences were common: 30 patients (60%) each reported at least 10 different depersonalization symptoms occurring often. A greater number of depersonalization experiences were associated with higher levels of paranoia and worry. The positive association of worry and paranoia became nonsignificant when controlling for depersonalization. Overall, depersonalization may be common in patients with persecutory delusions and is associated with the severity of paranoia. The results are consistent with the view that worry may cause depersonalization experiences that contribute to the occurrence of paranoid thoughts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000185

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Černis, E., Dunn, G., Startup, H., Kingdon, D., Wingham, G., Pugh, K., Cordwell, J., Mander, H., & Freeman, D.
Affiliations
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Černis, Emma
  • Startup, Helen
  • Pugh, Katherine
  • Freeman, Daniel
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2014-10
Volume
202
Issue
10
Pages
752-758
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2324329856
Cited by
14
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
depersonalization, persecutory delusions, paranoia, worry, anomalous experiences, psychotic symptoms, paranoid thinking, delusional disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Delusions, Depersonalization, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paranoid Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Comorbidity, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review