Cited by 125Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsMental Health Treatment and Access

Religious Involvement and Risk of Major Depression in a Prospective Nationwide Study of African American Adults

Ellison, Christopher G., Flannelly, Kevin J.·2009·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This study investigated the association between religious involvement and major depression in 607 African American adults, using longitudinal data from the National Survey of Black Americans. Logistic regression found that survey participants who reported receiving "a great deal" of guidance from religion in their day-to-day lives at Time 1 (1988-1989) were roughly half as likely (OR = 0.47, p < 0.01) to have major depression at Time 2 (1992), controlling for sociodemographic and psychological factors, and major depression at baseline. The odds of major depression were also lower for persons with high self-esteem (OR = 0.41, p < 0.01) and those who reported having satisfying relationships with friends and family members (OR = 0.51, p < 0.05) at baseline. No association was found between religious attendance or church support and major depression. The possible mechanisms through which religious involvement may protect against depression, especially among African Americans, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181b08f45

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 178 highest-rigor studies on R/S and depression, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression.

    “Of the 178 studies with the highest methodological rigor, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships [124–135] and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression [136–148].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellison, C. G., & Flannelly, K. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • HealthCare Chaplaincy Network (US)
Corresponding author
Ellison, Christopher G.
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2009-08
Volume
197
Issue
8
Pages
568-573
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985290452
Cited by
125
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag018432-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG18432)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
religious involvement, major depressive disorder, African American adults, religion and mental health, self-esteem, interpersonal relationships, religious service attendance, risk factors for depression
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Social Support, United States, Prevalence, Self Efficacy, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review