Cited by 20Migration, Health and TraumaGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Multidimensional Loss Scale: Validating a Cross-Cultural Instrument for Measuring Loss

Open access
Vromans, Lyn, Schweitzer, Robert D., Brough, Mark·2012·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

The Multidimensional Loss Scale (MLS) represents the first instrument designed specifically to index Experience of Loss Events and Loss Distress across multiple domains (cultural, social, material, and intrapersonal) relevant to refugee settlement. Recently settled Burmese adult refugees (N = 70) completed a questionnaire battery, including MLS items. Analyses explored MLS internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity, and factor structure. Cronbach alphas indicated satisfactory internal consistency for Experience of Loss Events (0.85) and Loss Distress (0.92), reflecting a unitary construct of multidimensional loss. Loss Distress did not correlate with depression or anxiety symptoms and correlated moderately with interpersonal grief and trauma symptoms, supporting divergent and convergent validity. Factor analysis provided preliminary support for a five-factor model: Loss of Symbolic Self, Loss of Interdependence, Loss of Home, Interpersonal Loss, and Loss of Intrapersonal Integrity. Received well by participants, the new scale shows promise for application in future research and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e31824cc458

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vromans et al. (2012) found that 98% of participants endorsed interpersonal grief (mean 2.97 on a 5-point scale) and 58% reported loss distress.

    “Vromans et al. (2012) found that 98% of participants endorsed interpersonal grief (mean of 2.97 measured on a 5 point scale) and 58% of participants reported loss distress.”
  • The Multidimensional Loss Scale (MLS) is one of the first instruments designed specifically to index Experience of Loss Events and Loss Distress across multiple domains relevant to refugee settlement.

    “The Multidimensional Loss Scale (MLS) (Vromans et al., 2012) is one of the first instruments designed specifically to index Experience of Loss Events and Loss Distress across multiple domains (cultural, social, material, and intrapersonal) relevant to refugee settlement.”
  • Assessed in recently settled Burmese adult refugees (N = 70), the MLS has five dimensions of loss: Loss of Symbolic Self, Loss of Interdependence, Loss of Home, Interpersonal Loss, and Loss of Intrapersonal Integrity.

    “Assessed in recently settled Burmese adult refugees (N = 70) the scale has five dimensions of loss: Loss of Symbolic Self, Loss of Interdependence, Loss of Home, Interpersonal Loss, and Loss of Intrapersonal Integrity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Almedom, A (2005) Social capital and mental health: An interdisciplinary review of primary evidence Social Science and Medicine 61: 943-964.
  2. Colic-Peisker V, Walker I (2003) Human capital, acculturation and social identity: Bosnian refugees in Australia. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 13: 337-360.
  3. Eisenbruch M, de Jong J, van de Put W (2004) Bringing order out of chaos: A culturally competent approach to managing the problems of refugees and victims of organized violence. Journal of Traumatic Stress 17:123-131.
  4. Gorsuch RL (1983) Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  5. Harvey JH (2000) Loss and trauma: General and close relationship perspectives.Great Britain: Routledge.
  6. James W (1890) Principles of psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Manderson, L & Vasey, K (2009) Cooking Alone: Social Capital and Wellbeing among Iraqi Women Refugees, 229-244 in Rural Victoria in Woolcock, G & Manderson, L (eds) Social Capital and Social Justice: Critical Australian Perspectives. Darwin: Charles Darwin University Press.
  8. Mollica R, Caspi-Yavin Y, Lavelle J, Tor S, Yang T, Chan S, Pham T, Ryan A, de Marneffe D (1994) The Harvard Trauma (HTQ) Manual. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Program in Refugee Trauma.
  9. Mollica RF, Donelan K, Frankel M, Elias, C, Tor, S, Lavelle, J, Blendon, RJ (1993) The effect of trauma and confinement on functional health and mental health status of Cambodians living in Thailand-Cambodia border camps. Journal of the American Medical Association 270:581- 586.
  10. Mollica R, McDonald L, Massagli M, Silove D (2004) Measuring trauma, measuring torture. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Program in Refugee Trauma.
  11. Nickerson A, Bryant RA, Brooks R, Steel Z, Silove D, Chen J (2011) The familial influence of loss and trauma on refugee mental health: A multilevel path analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, (in press)
  12. Parkes, C (1988) Bereavement as a psychosocial transition: Processes of adaption to change Journal of Social Issues 44 53-65Schweitzer R, Melville F, Steel Z, Lacherez P (2006) Trauma, post- migration living difficulties, and social support as predictors of psychological adjustment in resettled Sudanese refugees. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 40: 179-187.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vromans, L., Schweitzer, R. D., & Brough, M.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Vromans, Lyn
  • Schweitzer, Robert D.
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2012-04
Volume
200
Issue
4
Pages
349-357
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322755757
Cited by
20
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (LP0776558)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
loss of home, interpersonal loss, refugee settlement, Burmese refugees, grief, trauma symptoms, scale development, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Australia, Myanmar, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Depression, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Refugees, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review