Cited by 1,793Migration, Health and TraumaMigration and Exile StudiesMental Health Treatment and Access

Predisplacement and Postdisplacement Factors Associated With Mental Health of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons: A Meta-analysis

Porter, Matthew, Haslam, Nick·2005·JAMA

Abstract

Context The global refugee crisis requires that researchers, policymakers, and clinicians comprehend the magnitude of the psychological consequences of forced displacement and the factors that moderate them. To date, no empirical synthesis of research on these issues has been undertaken. Objective To meta-analytically establish the extent of compromised mental health among refugees (including internally displaced persons, asylum seekers, and stateless persons) using a worldwide study sample. Potential moderators of mental health outcomes were examined, including enduring contextual variables (eg, postdisplacement accommodation and economic opportunity) and refugee characteristics. Data sources Published studies (1959-2002) were obtained using broad searches of computerized databases (PsycINFO and PILOTS), manual searches of reference lists, and interviews with prominent authors. Study selection Studies were selected if they investigated a refugee group and at least 1 nonrefugee comparison group and reported 1 or more quantitative group comparison on measures of psychopathology. Fifty-six reports met inclusion criteria (4.4% of identified reports), yielding 59 independent comparisons and including 67,294 participants (22,221 refugees and 45,073 nonrefugees). Data extraction Data on study and report characteristics, study participant characteristics, and statistical outcomes were extracted using a coding manual and subjected to blind recoding, which indicated high reliability.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.294.5.602

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porter, M., & Haslam, N.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2005-08-03
Volume
294
Issue
5
Pages
602
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2139358896
Cited by
1,793
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 67
FWCI
27.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
refugees, internally displaced persons, asylum seekers, stateless persons, forced displacement, mental health, psychopathology, institutional accommodation, economic opportunities, repatriation, unresolved conflicts
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Emigration and Immigration, Humans, Mental Health, Refugees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review