Cited by 120Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Spirituality as a scientific construct: testing its universality across cultures and languages

Open access
MacDonald, Douglas A., Friedman, Harris L., Brewczynski, Jacek, Holland, Daniel, Salagame, Kiran Kumar K., Mohan, K. Krishna, Gubrij, Zuzana Ondriasova, Cheong, Hye Wook·2015·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Using data obtained from 4004 participants across eight countries (Canada, India, Japan, Korea, Poland, Slovakia, Uganda, and the U.S.), the factorial reliability, validity and structural/measurement invariance of a 30-item version of Expressions of Spirituality Inventory (ESI-R) was evaluated. The ESI-R measures a five factor model of spirituality developed through the conjoint factor analysis of several extant measures of spiritual constructs. Exploratory factor analyses of pooled data provided evidence that the five ESI-R factors are reliable. Confirmatory analyses comparing four and five factor models revealed that the five dimensional model demonstrates superior goodness-of-fit with all cultural samples and suggest that the ESI-R may be viewed as structurally invariant. Measurement invariance, however, was not supported as manifested in significant differences in item and dimension scores and in significantly poorer fit when factor loadings were constrained to equality across all samples. Exploratory analyses with a second adjective measure of spirituality using American, Indian, and Ugandan samples identified three replicable factors which correlated with ESI-R dimensions in a manner supportive of convergent validity. The paper concludes with a discussion of the meaning of the findings and directions needed for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0117701

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spirituality can be analyzed through multiple dimensions, and identifying these dimensions may clarify how individuals interact with their spirituality and which aspects have greater impact on health and treatment.

    “Spirituality can be analyzed through multiple dimensions, which identification may clarify how individuals interact with their spirituality, and which aspects greater impact more on health and treatment (Lunder et al., 2011; MacDonald et al., 2015).”

    From Defining spirituality in healthcare: a systematic review and conceptual framework. (2021) · cites this paper as MacDonald et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]Byrne BM (2010) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. 416 p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDonald, D. A., Friedman, H. L., Brewczynski, J., Holland, D., Salagame, K. K. K., Mohan, K. K., Gubrij, Z. O., & Cheong, H. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Detroit Mercy (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Mysore (IN)
  • Mahidol University (TH)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
MacDonald, Douglas A.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2015-03-03
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
e0117701
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040012545
Cited by
120
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
18.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spirituality, cross-cultural invariance, convergent validity, cross-cultural universality, spirituality measurement, factor structure
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Models, Theoretical, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review