Cited by 38Reproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology

The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City.

Pathela, Preeti, Hennessy, Robin R., Blank, Susan, Parvez, Farah, Franklin, Woodman, Schillinger, Julia A.·2009·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With noninvasive specimen types, males can be more easily screened for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. Long-standing universal screening of males attending New York City (NYC) sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinics has yielded a substantial number of chlamydia cases. In 2005, screening was expanding to another large group at high risk for STD: males </=35 years old entering 6 adult jails. METHODS: Surveillance data and data from laboratory practice surveys were examined to evaluate changes in the reported burden of chlamydia and gonorrhea in NYC males over time. Citywide data for male chlamydia and gonorrhea cases were analyzed by report year and provider type (STD clinic, adult jail, juvenile detention, private-sector provider) from 2004 through 2006. RESULTS: In the first year of the adult jail screening program, the number of chlamydia cases among males </=35 years old reported from the jails increased by 1636%, surpassing all other providers in numbers of cases contributed, and increasing the citywide reported male chlamydia case rate by 59%. Adult jails reported 40% more cases than all 10 NYC public STD clinics combined. In 2006, adult jails continued to contribute a similar proportion to citywide male chlamydia case reports. In the first year of the jail screening program, there was an approximately 10-fold increase in the number of gonorrhea cases reported from jails. CONCLUSIONS: Young men in adult jails have a large burden of chlamydial infection. Correctional screening and treatment programs present an important opportunity to improve the health of inmates and interrupt disease transmission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0b013e31815615bb

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In jurisdictions with comprehensive, targeted jail screening, more chlamydial infections among females (and males if screened) are detected and subsequently treated in the correctional setting than in any other single reporting source and might represent the majority of reported cases in certain jurisdictions.

    “For example, in jurisdictions with comprehensive, targeted jail screening, more chlamydial infections among females (and males if screened) are detected and subsequently treated in the correctional setting than in any other single reporting source (141,374) and might represent the majority of reported cases in certain jurisdictions (375).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [375]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pathela, P., Hennessy, R. R., Blank, S., Parvez, F., Franklin, W., & Schillinger, J. A.
Affiliations
  • New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
  • Pathela, Preeti
  • Hennessy, Robin R.
  • Blank, Susan
  • Parvez, Farah
  • Franklin, Woodman
  • Schillinger, Julia A.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2009-02
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
S58-S61
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078432724
Cited by
38
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
Keywords
chlamydia, gonorrhea, prison health care, urine-based screening, young men, New York City, disease transmission interruption
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Chlamydia Infections, Chlamydia trachomatis, Female, Gonorrhea, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Mass Screening, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, New York City, Population Surveillance, Prisoners, Prisons, Urine, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review