Cited by 125Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMedication Adherence and Compliance

Does a Web-Based Exercise Programming System Improve Home Exercise Adherence for People With Musculoskeletal Conditions?: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bennell, Kim L., Marshall, Charlotte J., Dobson, Fiona, Kasza, Jessica, Lonsdale, Chris, Hinman, Rana S.·2019·American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether a web-based exercise programming system improves adherence to a home exercise program for people with musculoskeletal conditions. Design: Eligible patients with a musculoskeletal condition presenting to a physical therapist in private practice were randomized to the following: (a) control (home exercise prescribed by therapist’s usual methods) or (b) intervention (home exercise prescribed using a web-based exercise programming system). The primary outcome was self-rated exercise adherence measured at week 3 via 11-point Numeric Rating Scales. Secondary outcomes were satisfaction with exercise delivery and confidence in ability to undertake prescribed exercise. Process measures were also included. Results: We enrolled 305 participants, with loss to follow-up of 14.5% (22/152) and 13.7% (21/153) in intervention and control groups, respectively. Compared with controls, the intervention group reported higher exercise adherence (mean difference Numeric Rating Scale units (95% confidence intervals): adherence overall −1.0 [−1.6 to −0.3] and regarding number of exercises in session −0.7 [−1.3 to −0.1], number of repetitions −0.8 [−1.4 to −0.2], and number of sessions −1.0 [−1.6 to −0.3]). The intervention group showed greater confidence to exercise than control, with no difference in satisfaction. Conclusions: A web-based exercise programming system improved home exercise adherence and confidence in ability to undertake exercise, although the clinical relevance of the results needs to be established.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/phm.0000000000001204

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennell, K. L., Marshall, C. J., Dobson, F., Kasza, J., Lonsdale, C., & Hinman, R. S.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Bennell, Kim L.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Published
2019-04-23
Volume
98
Issue
10
Pages
850-858
ISSN
  • 0894-9115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-7385
OpenAlex
W2942260654
Cited by
125
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14
FWCI
10.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
home exercise program, exercise adherence, musculoskeletal disorders, exercise confidence, exercise satisfaction, physiotherapy, exercise prescription
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Adult, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Patient Compliance, Treatment Outcome, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review