Cited by 91Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Feasibility of a virtual exercise coach to promote walking in community-dwelling persons with Parkinson Disease

Open access
Ellis, Terry, Latham, Nancy K., DeAngelis, Tamara R., Thomas, Cathi A., Saint-Hilaire, Marie, Bickmore, Timothy W.·2013·American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The short-term benefits of exercise for persons with Parkinson disease (PD) are well established, but long-term adherence is limited. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of a virtual exercise coach to promote daily walking in community-dwelling persons with Parkinson disease. DESIGN: Twenty subjects with Parkinson disease participated in this phase 1, single-group, nonrandomized clinical trial. The subjects were instructed to interact with the virtual exercise coach for 5 mins, wear a pedometer, and walk daily for 1 mo. Retention rate, satisfaction, and interaction history were assessed at 1 mo. Six-minute walk and gait speed were assessed at baseline and after the intervention. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the participants were women, and the mean age was 65.6 yrs. At the study completion, there was 100% retention rate. The subjects had a mean satisfaction score of 5.6/7 (with 7 indicating maximal satisfaction) with the virtual exercise coach. Interaction history revealed that the participants logged in for a mean (SD) of 25.4 (7) days of the recommended 30 days. The mean adherence to daily walking was 85%. Both gait speed and the 6-min walk test significantly improved (P < 0.05). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Sedentary persons with Parkinson disease successfully used a computer and interacted with a virtual exercise coach. Retention, satisfaction, and adherence to daily walking were high for 1 mo, and significant improvements were seen in mobility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/phm.0b013e31828cd466

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Bickmore T Relational Agents: Effecting Change through Human-Computer Relationships 2003 Cambridge, MA Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  2. [25]Thompson WR Gordon NF LSP ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription Eighth Edition 2010 Baltimore Lipponcott Williams and Wilkons

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellis, T., Latham, N. K., DeAngelis, T. R., Thomas, C. A., Saint-Hilaire, M., & Bickmore, T. W.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Ellis, Terry
Venue
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Published
2013-06
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
472-485
ISSN
0894-9115 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979696614
Cited by
91
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k12hd043444-10)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG028668)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12-HD043444)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, walking, exercise adherence, community-dwelling persons, walking speed, 6-minute walk test, pedometers, feasibility, acceptability, digital health interventions, mobility (physical function)
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Aged, Exercise Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Patient Participation, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, User-Computer Interface, Walking, Treatment Outcome, Gait Disorders, Neurologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review