Cited by 2Physical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Behavioural change for Parkinson’s Disease: A randomised controlled feasibility study to promote physical activity and exercise adherence among people with Parkinson’s: study protocol

Open access
Ahern, Leanne, Timmons, Suzanne, Lamb, Sarah E., McCullagh, Ruth·2024·HRB Open Research

Abstract

Background Parkinson’s is a common progressive neurological condition characterized by motor and non-motor deficits. Physical activity and exercise can improve health, but many people with Parkinson’s (PwP) have trouble reaching the recommended dosage. Our recent literature review found improvements in exercise adherence with behavioural change interventions, but it remains unclear which are most effective. Further qualitative research and patient and public involvement has informed a novel behavioural change intervention to be tested alongside an existing exercise program. Objective To examine the feasibility of behavioural change techniques delivered alongside an exercise programme to improve physical activity, function, and self-efficacy in PwP (and study procedures) to inform a future pilot RCT trial. Methods A parallel-arm single blinded randomised feasibility study. Twenty participants with Parkinson’s (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-3) will be recruited from a physiotherapy primary-care waiting list. Following written consent, and baseline assessment, the participants will be randomly allocated to the intervention (n=10) or the control group (n=10). Both groups will receive usual care, which includes a weekly program of a multidisciplinary education, a supervised exercise class and a prescribed home exercise program. The intervention group will receive additional behavioural change techniques, targeting behaviour regulation, belief about capabilities and social influences. Class and home exercise adherence, behavioural component uptake and adherence, and negative events will be recorded. Outcomes will include enrolment and maintenance rates, physical function, falls, physical activity, and exercise self-efficacy measured pre- and post- the 12-week program (in-person). Surveys will be used to compare experiences and satisfaction between groups. Exit interviews will be completed with the intervention group only, exploring their experience of the behavioural change techniques. Discussion The results will help inform a future pilot RCT, based on the intervention acceptability, consent rate, maintenance, and protocol integrity. Trial Registration ClincialTrials.gov NCT06192628

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12688/hrbopenres.13843.1

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attrition may have a detrimental impact on research outcomes.

    “which may have a detrimental impact on research outcomes (Ahern et al., 2024).”

    From A Systematic Review of Third-Wave Therapies to Reduce Distress and Improve Wellbeing and Quality of Life in People with Parkinson's Disease. (2025) · cites this paper as Ahern et al., 2024

    The Methods > Outcomes measures table lists study and intervention dropout rates as feasibility outcomes. Methods > Data analysis also says participants with no follow-up measurements will be excluded. These passages show that attrition matters to this study, but they do not state that it has a detrimental impact on research outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]Ahern L: Extended data for behavioural change for Parkinson’s disease: A randomised controlled feasibility study to promote physical activity and exercise adherence among people with Parkinson’s, study protocol. Zenodo. 2024. 10.5281/zenodo.10407626 PMC11109530 38784965 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahern, L., Timmons, S., Lamb, S. E., & McCullagh, R.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Ahern, Leanne
Venue
HRB Open Research
Published
2024-02-16
Volume
7
Pages
7
ISSN
2515-4826 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391893307
Cited by
2
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HRB Open Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Irish Research Council Enterprise Partnership Scheme (EPSPG/2021/77)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, behaviour change interventions, physical activity, exercise adherence, self-efficacy, physical function, falls, supervised exercise, home exercise program, physiotherapy, feasibility, behavioral regulation, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review