The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofilm Management in Wound Care
Abstract
Learning Objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the basics of biofilm infection and be able to distinguish between planktonic and biofilm modes of growth. 2. Have a working knowledge of conventional and emerging antibiofilm therapies and their modes of action as they pertain to wound care. 3. Understand the challenges associated with testing and marketing antibiofilm strategies and the context within which these strategies may have effective value. Summary: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate for human infectious diseases caused by bacteria with a biofilm phenotype is 65 percent and the National Institutes of Health estimate is closer to 80 percent. Biofilms are hostile microbial aggregates because, within their polymeric matrix cocoons, they are protected from antimicrobial therapy and attack from host defenses. Biofilm-infected wounds, even when closed, show functional deficits such as deficient extracellular matrix and impaired barrier function, which are likely to cause wound recidivism. The management of invasive wound infection often includes systemic antimicrobial therapy in combination with débridement of wounds to a healthy tissue bed as determined by the surgeon who has no way of visualizing the biofilm. The exceedingly high incidence of false-negative cultures for bacteria in a biofilm state leads to missed diagnoses of wound infection. The use of topical and parenteral antimicrobial therapy without wound débridement have had limited impact on decreasing biofilm infection, which remains a major problem in wound care. Current claims to manage wound biofilm infection rest on limited early-stage data. In most cases, such data originate from limited experimental systems that lack host immune defense. In making decisions on the choice of commercial products to manage wound biofilm infection, it is important to critically appreciate the mechanism of action and significance of the relevant experimental system. In this work, the authors critically review different categories of antibiofilm products, with emphasis on their strengths and limitations as evident from the published literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Biofilms in chronic wounds act as hostile microbial aggregates as they remain encased within their polymeric matrix cocoons, making them resistant to both antimicrobial therapy and host immune defenses.1”
From SEMTWIST Quantification of Biofilm Infection in Human Chronic Wound Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Machine Learning (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“The extent to which the BFI burden negatively impacts wound healing outcomes depends on the balance between BFI threat and countering defenses, including host factors and therapeutic intervention.1,3,14,15”
From SEMTWIST Quantification of Biofilm Infection in Human Chronic Wound Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Machine Learning (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lewis, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306 · Cited by 1,858
Interactions between Bacteriophage, Bacteria, and the Mammalian Immune System
Van Belleghem, J. D., Dąbrowska, K., Vaneechoutte, M., Barr, J. J., & Bollyky, P. L. (2018) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v11010010 · Cited by 408
Mixed‐species biofilm compromises wound healing by disrupting epidermal barrier function
Roy, S., Elgharably, H., Sinha, M., Ganesh, K., Chaney, S., Mann, E., Miller, C., Khanna, S., Bergdall, V. K., Powell, H. M., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.4360 · Cited by 208
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 159
- Percival, 2015, Biofilms and wounds: An overview of the evidence., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 373, 10.1089/wound.2014.0557 · DOI
- Percival, 2015, Biofilms and wounds: An identification algorithm and potential treatment options., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 389, 10.1089/wound.2014.0574 · DOI
- Donlan, 2002, Biofilms: Microbial life on surfaces., Emerg Infect Dis, 8, 881, 10.3201/eid0809.020063 · DOI · Paper page
- Jefferson, 2004, What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm?, FEMS Microbiol Lett, 236, 163, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09643.x · DOI
- Costerton, 2005, Biofilm in implant infections: Its production and regulation., Int J Artif Organs, 28, 1062, 10.1177/039139880502801103 · DOI
- Høiby, 2011, The clinical impact of bacterial biofilms., Int J Oral Sci, 3, 55, 10.4248/IJOS11026 · DOI
- Hurlow, 2015, Clinical biofilms: A challenging frontier in wound care., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 295, 10.1089/wound.2014.0567 · DOI
- Wolcott, 2011, The role of biofilms: Are we hitting the right target?, Plast Reconstr Surg, 127, 28S, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fca244 · DOI
- Cooper, 2014, Biofilms in wounds: A review of present knowledge., J Wound Care, 23, 570, 572, 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.11.570 · DOI
- Donlan, 2002, Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms., Clin Microbiol Rev, 15, 167, 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002 · DOI · Paper page
- Gonzalez, 2018, Chronic biofilm-based infections: Skewing of the immune response., Pathog Dis, 76, fty023, 10.1093/femspd/fty023 · DOI
- Roilides, 2015, How biofilms evade host defenses., Microbiol Spectr, 3, 10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0012-2014 · DOI
- Rybtke, 2015, Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infections: Community structure, antimicrobial tolerance and immune response., J Mol Biol, 427, 3628, 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.08.016 · DOI
- Watters, 2016, Host responses to biofilm., Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci, 142, 193, 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2016.05.007 · DOI
- Bhattacharya, 2018, Staphylococcus aureus biofilms release leukocidins to elicit extracellular trap formation and evade neutrophil-mediated killing., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 115, 7416, 10.1073/pnas.1721949115 · DOI
- Barki, 2019, Electric field based dressing disrupts mixed-species bacterial biofilm infection and restores functional wound healing., Ann Surg, 269, 756, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002504 · DOI
- Roy, 2020, Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection compromises wound healing by causing deficiencies in granulation tissue collagen., Ann Surg, 271, 1174, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003053 · DOI
- Sen, 2016, Cutaneous imaging technologies in acute burn and chronic wound care., Plast Reconstr Surg, 138, 119S, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002654 · DOI
- Altemus, 2001, Stress-induced changes in skin barrier function in healthy women., J Invest Dermatol, 117, 309, 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01373.x · DOI
- Firooz, 2016, Daytime changes of skin biophysical characteristics: A study of hydration, transepidermal water loss, pH, sebum, elasticity, erythema, and color index on Middle Eastern skin., Indian J Dermatol, 61, 700, 10.4103/0019-5154.193707 · DOI
- Grice, 1975, The relationship of transepidermal water loss to skin temperature in psoriasis and eczema., J Invest Dermatol, 64, 313, 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12512258 · DOI · Paper page
- Grice, 1971, Skin temperature and transepidermal water loss., J Invest Dermatol, 57, 108, 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12349617 · DOI
- Madison, 2003, Barrier function of the skin: “La raison d’être” of the epidermis., J Invest Dermatol, 121, 231, 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12359.x · DOI
- Mohd Noor, 2013, Transepidermal water loss in erythrodermic patients of various aetiologies., Skin Res Technol, 19, 320, 10.1111/srt.12048 · DOI
- Nikam, 2019, Transepidermal water loss in psoriasis: A case-control study., Indian Dermatol Online J, 10, 267, 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_180_18 · DOI
- Rowe, 1981, Transepidermal water loss in the infant surgical patient., J Pediatr Surg, 16, 878, 10.1016/S0022-3468(81)80839-1 · DOI
- Shahidullah, 1969, Transepidermal water loss in patients with dermatitis., Br J Dermatol, 81, 722, 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1969.tb15931.x · DOI
- Barker, 2017, A formidable foe is sabotaging your results: What you should know about biofilms and wound healing., Plast Reconstr Surg, 139, 1184e, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003325 · DOI
- Wolcott, 2008, Biofilms and chronic wound inflammation., J Wound Care, 17, 333, 10.12968/jowc.2008.17.8.30796 · DOI
- Arciola, 2012, Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections: A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials., Biomaterials, 33, 5967, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.031 · DOI
- Costerton, 2007, Bacterial communications in implant infections: A target for an intelligence war., Int J Artif Organs, 30, 757, 10.1177/039139880703000903 · DOI
- Dasgupta, 1989, Significance of biofilm-adherent bacterial microcolonies on Tenckhoff catheters of CAPD patients., Blood Purif, 7, 144, 10.1159/000169586 · DOI
- Dasgupta, 1993, Biofilm and peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis., Perit Dial Int, 13, S322, 10.1177/089686089301302S79 · DOI
- Ehrlich, 2005, Engineering approaches for the detection and control of orthopaedic biofilm infections., Clin Orthop Relat Res, 437, 59, 10.1097/00003086-200508000-00011 · DOI
- Hall-Stoodley, 2012, Towards diagnostic guidelines for biofilm-associated infections., FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 65, 127, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00968.x · DOI
- Holland, 1991, Biofilm and scleral buckle-associated infections: A mechanism for persistence., Ophthalmology, 98, 933, 10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32199-7 · DOI
- Kowalewska-Grochowska, 1991, Guidewire catheter change in central venous catheter biofilm formation in a burn population., Chest, 100, 1090, 10.1378/chest.100.4.1090 · DOI
- Marrie, 1990, Bacterial biofilm formation on nasogastric tubes., J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, 503, 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1990.tb01431.x · DOI
- Matsukawa, 2005, Bacterial colonization on intraluminal surface of urethral catheter., Urology, 65, 440, 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.065 · DOI
- Nickel, 1986, Bacterial biofilm in persistent penile prosthesis-associated infection., J Urol, 135, 586, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)45747-8 · DOI
- Stoodley, 2011, Orthopaedic biofilm infections., Curr Orthop Pract, 22, 558, 10.1097/BCO.0b013e318230efcf · DOI
- Kathju, 2010, Bacterial biofilm on monofilament suture and porcine xenograft after inguinal herniorrhaphy., FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 59, 405, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00691.x · DOI
- Kathju, 2014, Bacterial biofilms on implanted suture material are a cause of surgical site infection., Surg Infect (Larchmt.), 15, 592, 10.1089/sur.2013.016 · DOI
- Kathju, 2009, Chronic surgical site infection due to suture-associated polymicrobial biofilm., Surg Infect (Larchmt.), 10, 457, 10.1089/sur.2008.062 · DOI
- Kathju, 2010, Cutaneous fistula from the gastric remnant resulting from a chronic suture-associated biofilm infection., Obes Surg, 20, 251, 10.1007/s11695-009-9921-8 · DOI
- Kathju, 2015, Direct demonstration of bacterial biofilms on prosthetic mesh after ventral herniorrhaphy., Surg Infect (Larchmt.), 16, 45, 10.1089/sur.2014.026 · DOI
- Bjarnsholt, 2015, Antibiofilm properties of acetic acid., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 363, 10.1089/wound.2014.0554 · DOI
- Finnegan, 2015, EDTA: An antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent for use in wound care., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 415, 10.1089/wound.2014.0577 · DOI
- Finnegan, 2015, Clinical and antibiofilm efficacy of antimicrobial hydrogels., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 398, 10.1089/wound.2014.0556 · DOI
- Jones, 2015, The effect of pH on the extracellular matrix and biofilms., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 431, 10.1089/wound.2014.0538 · DOI
- Percival, 2015, Silver and alginates: Role in wound healing and biofilm control., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 407, 10.1089/wound.2014.0541 · DOI
- Salisbury, 2018, Efficacy of concentrated surfactant-based wound dressings in wound repair and biofilm reduction., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 7, 315, 10.1089/wound.2017.0782 · DOI
- Parsek, 2003, Bacterial biofilms: An emerging link to disease pathogenesis., Annu Rev Microbiol, 57, 677, 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090720 · DOI
- Ganesh, 2015, Chronic wound biofilm model., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 382, 10.1089/wound.2014.0587 · DOI
- Lebeaux, 2013, From in vitro to in vivo models of bacterial biofilm-related infections., Pathogens, 2, 288, 10.3390/pathogens2020288 · DOI
- Kim, 2018, Viable but non-culturable and persistence describe the same bacterial stress state., Environ Microbiol, 20, 2038, 10.1111/1462-2920.14075 · DOI
- Khansa, 2018, Use of antibiotic impregnated resorbable beads reduces pressure ulcer recurrence: A retrospective analysis., Wound Repair Regen, 26, 221, 10.1111/wrr.12638 · DOI
- Wolcott, 2009, Regular debridement is the main tool for maintaining a healthy wound bed in most chronic wounds., J Wound Care, 18, 54, 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.2.38743 · DOI
- Wolcott, 2010, Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time-dependent therapeutic window., J Wound Care, 19, 320, 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.8.77709 · DOI
- Brown, 2012, Blow fly Lucilia sericata nuclease digests DNA associated with wound slough/eschar and with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm., Med Vet Entomol, 26, 432, 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01029.x · DOI
- van der Plas, 2008, Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa., J Antimicrob Chemother, 61, 117, 10.1093/jac/dkm407 · DOI
- Cowan, 2013, Chronic wounds, biofilms and use of medicinal larvae., Ulcers, 2013, 1, 10.1155/2013/487024 · DOI
- Bohova, 2014, Selective antibiofilm effects of Lucilia sericata larvae secretions/excretions against wound pathogens., Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2014, 857360, 10.1155/2014/857360 · DOI
- Chang, 2017, Low-frequency ultrasound debridement in chronic wound healing: A systematic review of current evidence., Plast Surg (Oakv.), 25, 21, 10.1177/2292550317693813 · DOI
- Paliwal, 2008, Therapeutic opportunities in biological responses of ultrasound., Ultrasonics, 48, 271, 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.02.002 · DOI
- Lai, 2007, Physiological effects of ultrasound mist on fibroblasts., Int J Dermatol, 46, 587, 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.02914.x · DOI
- Scherba, 1991, Quantitative assessment of the germicidal efficacy of ultrasonic energy., Appl Environ Microbiol, 57, 2079, 10.1128/aem.57.7.2079-2084.1991 · DOI
- Stanisic, 2005, Wound debridement with 25 kHz ultrasound., Adv Skin Wound Care, 18, 484, 10.1097/00129334-200511000-00012 · DOI
- Suchkova, 1998, Enhancement of fibrinolysis with 40-kHz ultrasound., Circulation, 98, 1030, 10.1161/01.CIR.98.10.1030 · DOI
- Crone, 2015, A novel in vitro wound biofilm model used to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement., J Wound Care, 24, 64, 66, 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.2.64 · DOI
- Escandon, 2012, A prospective pilot study of ultrasound therapy effectiveness in refractory venous leg ulcers., Int Wound J, 9, 570, 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00921.x · DOI
- Granick, 2017, Direct-contact low-frequency ultrasound clearance of biofilm from metallic implant materials., Eplasty, 17, e13
- Dong, 2013, Synergy of ultrasound microbubbles and vancomycin against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm., J Antimicrob Chemother, 68, 816, 10.1093/jac/dks490 · DOI
- Fu, 2019, Synergistic antibacterial effect of ultrasound microbubbles combined with chitosan-modified polymyxin B-loaded liposomes on biofilm-producing Acinetobacter baumannii., Int J Nanomedicine, 14, 1805, 10.2147/IJN.S186571 · DOI
- Li, 2015, Ultrasound microbubbles enhance human β-defensin 3 against biofilms., J Surg Res, 199, 458, 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.030 · DOI
- Zhu, 2013, Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction enhances human β-defensin 3 activity against antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus biofilms., Inflammation, 36, 983, 10.1007/s10753-013-9630-2 · DOI
- Gilmore, 2018, Cold plasmas for biofilm control: Opportunities and challenges., Trends Biotechnol, 36, 627, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.007 · DOI
- Mai-Prochnow, 2014, Atmospheric pressure plasmas: Infection control and bacterial responses., Int J Antimicrob Agents, 43, 508, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.025 · DOI
- Ziuzina, 2015, Cold plasma inactivation of bacterial biofilms and reduction of quorum sensing regulated virulence factors., PLoS One, 10, e0138209, 10.1371/journal.pone.0138209 · DOI
- Hu, 2018, Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy to control clinically relevant biofilm infections., Front Microbiol, 9, 1299, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01299 · DOI
- Wang, 2016, Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of Gram-negative pathogens in biofilms: In vitro and in vivo studies., J Infect Dis, 213, 1380, 10.1093/infdis/jiw070 · DOI
- de Freitas, 2017, Effect of photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy on mono- and multi-species cariogenic biofilms: A literature review., Photomed Laser Surg, 35, 239, 10.1089/pho.2016.4108 · DOI
- Mamone, 2016, Photodynamic inactivation of planktonic and biofilm growing bacteria mediated by a meso-substituted porphyrin bearing four basic amino groups., J Photochem Photobiol B, 161, 222, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.05.026 · DOI
- Dovigo, 2011, Investigation of the photodynamic effects of curcumin against Candida albicans., Photochem Photobiol, 87, 895, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00937.x · DOI
- Bliss, 2004, Susceptibility of Candida species to photodynamic effects of photofrin., Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 48, 2000, 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2000-2006.2004 · DOI
- Kashef, 2013, Effect of sub-lethal photodynamic inactivation on the antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm formation of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates., Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 10, 368, 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2013.02.005 · DOI
- Kim, 2016, Nanoparticle-based therapies for wound biofilm infection: Opportunities and challenges., IEEE Trans Nanobioscience, 15, 294, 10.1109/TNB.2016.2527600 · DOI
- Leaper, 2012, Appropriate use of silver dressings in wounds: International consensus document., Int Wound J, 9, 461, 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01091.x · DOI
- Chen, 2008, Nanosilver: A nanoproduct in medical application., Toxicol Lett, 176, 1, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.10.004 · DOI
- Bowler, 2016, Combatting wound biofilm and recalcitrance with a novel anti-biofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing., Wound Med, 14, 6, 10.1016/j.wndm.2016.05.005 · DOI
- Phillips, 2015, Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants., Int Wound J, 12, 469, 10.1111/iwj.12142 · DOI
- Davis, 2019, Preclinical evaluation of a novel silver gelling fiber dressing on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a porcine wound infection model., Wound Repair Regen, 27, 360, 10.1111/wrr.12718 · DOI
- Rai, 2009, Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials., Biotechnol Adv, 27, 76, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002 · DOI
- Roe, 2008, Antimicrobial surface functionalization of plastic catheters by silver nanoparticles., J Antimicrob Chemother, 61, 869, 10.1093/jac/dkn034 · DOI
- Lee, 2016, Fabrication of a silver particle-integrated silicone polymer-covered metal stent against sludge and biofilm formation and stent-induced tissue inflammation., Sci Rep, 6, 35446, 10.1038/srep35446 · DOI
- Wang, 2015, Antifouling coating with controllable and sustained silver release for long-term inhibition of infection and encrustation in urinary catheters., J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 103, 519, 10.1002/jbm.b.33230 · DOI
- Wen, 2016, Silver-nanoparticle-coated biliary stent inhibits bacterial adhesion in bacterial cholangitis in swine., Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 15, 87, 10.1016/S1499-3872(15)60410-6 · DOI
- Mohanty, 2012, An investigation on the antibacterial, cytotoxic, and antibiofilm efficacy of starch-stabilized silver nanoparticles., Nanomedicine, 8, 916, 10.1016/j.nano.2011.11.007 · DOI
- Stevens, 2009, The relationship between the antimicrobial effect of catheter coatings containing silver nanoparticles and the coagulation of contacting blood., Biomaterials, 30, 3682, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.054 · DOI
- Fitzgerald, 2017, Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo., Wound Repair Regen, 25, 13, 10.1111/wrr.12497 · DOI
- Akiyama, 2004, Assessment of cadexomer iodine against Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vivo and in vitro using confocal laser scanning microscopy., J Dermatol, 31, 529, 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2004.tb00549.x · DOI
- Malone, 2017, Effect of cadexomer iodine on the microbial load and diversity of chronic non-healing diabetic foot ulcers complicated by biofilm in vivo., J Antimicrob Chemother, 72, 2093, 10.1093/jac/dkx099 · DOI
- Roche, 2019, Cadexomer iodine effectively reduces bacterial biofilm in porcine wounds ex vivo and in vivo., Int Wound J, 16, 674, 10.1111/iwj.13080 · DOI
- Robson, 2007, Hypochlorous acid as a potential wound care agent: Part II. Stabilized hypochlorous acid. Its role in decreasing tissue bacterial bioburden and overcoming the inhibition of infection on wound healing., J Burns Wounds, 6, e6
- Sakarya, 2014, Hypochlorous acid: An ideal wound care agent with powerful microbicidal, antibiofilm, and wound healing potency., Wounds, 26, 342
- Rani, 2014, The in vitro antimicrobial activity of wound and skin cleansers at nontoxic concentrations., Adv Skin Wound Care, 27, 65, 10.1097/01.ASW.0000443255.73875.a3 · DOI
- Romanowski, 2018, In vitro evaluation of a hypochlorous acid hygiene solution on established biofilms., Eye Contact Lens, 442, S187, 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000456 · DOI
- Day, 2017, Disruption of biofilms and neutralization of bacteria using hypochlorous acid solution: An in vivo and in vitro evaluation., Adv Skin Wound Care, 30, 543, 10.1097/01.ASW.0000526607.80113.66 · DOI
- Papenfort, 2016, Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria., Nat Rev Microbiol, 14, 576, 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89 · DOI · Paper page
- Heilmann, 2015, Why do bacteria regulate public goods by quorum sensing? How the shapes of cost and benefit functions determine the form of optimal regulation., Front Microbiol, 6, 767, 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00767 · DOI
- Lee, 2011, Low concentrations of honey reduce biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and virulence in Escherichia coli O157:H7., Biofouling, 27, 1095, 10.1080/08927014.2011.633704 · DOI
- Truchado, 2009, Inhibition by chestnut honey of N-Acyl-L-homoserine lactones and biofilm formation in Erwinia carotovora, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Aeromonas hydrophila., J Agric Food Chem, 57, 11186, 10.1021/jf9029139 · DOI
- He, 2012, Use of the quorum sensing inhibitor furanone C-30 to interfere with biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans and its luxS mutant strain., Int J Antimicrob Agents, 40, 30, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.03.016 · DOI
- Hentzer, 2002, Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria by a halogenated furanone compound., Microbiology (Reading), 148, 87, 10.1099/00221287-148-1-87 · DOI
- Yang, 2014, Bicyclic brominated furanones: A new class of quorum sensing modulators that inhibit bacterial biofilm formation., Bioorg Med Chem, 22, 1313, 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.01.004 · DOI
- Rémy, 2018, Interference in bacterial quorum sensing: A biopharmaceutical perspective., Front Pharmacol, 9, 203, 10.3389/fphar.2018.00203 · DOI
- Hannan, 2018, In vitro Salmonella typhi biofilm formation on gallstones and its disruption by Manuka honey., Pak J Pharm Sci, 31, 129
- Maddocks, 2013, Manuka honey inhibits adhesion and invasion of medically important wound bacteria in vitro., Future Microbiol, 8, 1523, 10.2217/fmb.13.126 · DOI
- Maddocks, 2012, Manuka honey inhibits the development of Streptococcus pyogenes biofilms and causes reduced expression of two fibronectin binding proteins., Microbiology (Reading), 158, 781, 10.1099/mic.0.053959-0 · DOI
- Majtan, 2014, Anti-biofilm effects of honey against wound pathogens Proteus mirabilis and Enterobacter cloacae., Phytother Res, 28, 69, 10.1002/ptr.4957 · DOI
- Piotrowski, 2017, Antimicrobial effects of Manuka honey on in vitro biofilm formation by Clostridium difficile., Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 36, 1661, 10.1007/s10096-017-2980-1 · DOI
- Liu, 2014, Antibiotic-specific differences in the response of Staphylococcus aureus to treatment with antimicrobials combined with manuka honey., Front Microbiol, 5, 779
- Liu, 2017, Rifampicin-manuka honey combinations are superior to other antibiotic-manuka honey combinations in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilms., Front Microbiol, 8, 2653, 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02653 · DOI
- Campeau, 2014, Antibiofilm activity of manuka honey in combination with antibiotics., Int J Bacteriol, 2014, 795281, 10.1155/2014/795281 · DOI
- Camplin, 2014, Manuka honey treatment of biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa results in the emergence of isolates with increased honey resistance., Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 13, 19, 10.1186/1476-0711-13-19 · DOI
- Carter, 2016, Therapeutic manuka honey: No longer so alternative., Front Microbiol, 7, 569, 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00569 · DOI
- Johnston, 2018, Antibacterial activity of manuka honey and its components: An overview., AIMS Microbiol, 4, 655, 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.655 · DOI
- Kamaratos, 2014, Manuka honey-impregnated dressings in the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers., Int Wound J, 11, 259, 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01082.x · DOI
- Molan, 2015, Honey: A biologic wound dressing., Wounds, 27, 141
- White, 2016, Manuka honey in wound management: Greater than the sum of its parts?, J Wound Care, 25, 539, 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.9.539 · DOI
- Paramasivan, 2014, Methylglyoxal-augmented manuka honey as a topical anti-Staphylococcus aureus biofilm agent: Safety and efficacy in an in vivo model., Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 4, 187, 10.1002/alr.21264 · DOI
- Qamar, 2018, In vitro and in vivo activity of manuka honey against NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11., Future Microbiol, 13, 13, 10.2217/fmb-2017-0119 · DOI
- Ashrafi, 2016, The efficacy of electrical stimulation in experimentally induced cutaneous wounds in animals., Vet Dermatol, 27, 235, 10.1111/vde.12328 · DOI
- Ashrafi, 2017, The efficacy of electrical stimulation in lower extremity cutaneous wound healing: A systematic review., Exp Dermatol, 26, 171, 10.1111/exd.13179 · DOI
- Devine, 1998, Electric stimulation and wound healing., J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 25, 291
- Hunckler, 2017, A current affair: Electrotherapy in wound healing., J Multidiscip Healthc, 10, 179, 10.2147/JMDH.S127207 · DOI
- Kloth, 2014, Electrical stimulation technologies for wound healing., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 3, 81, 10.1089/wound.2013.0459 · DOI
- Reid, 2014, The electrical response to injury: Molecular mechanisms and wound healing., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 3, 184, 10.1089/wound.2013.0442 · DOI
- Thakral, 2013, Electrical stimulation to accelerate wound healing., Diabet Foot Ankle, 4, 10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22081 · DOI
- Torkaman, 2014, Electrical stimulation of wound healing: A review of animal experimental evidence., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 3, 202, 10.1089/wound.2012.0409 · DOI
- Ud-Din, 2014, Electrical stimulation and cutaneous wound healing: A review of clinical evidence., Healthcare (Basel), 2, 445, 10.3390/healthcare2040445 · DOI
- Banerjee, 2015, Silver-zinc redox-coupled electroceutical wound dressing disrupts bacterial biofilm., PLoS One, 10, e0119531, 10.1371/journal.pone.0119531 · DOI
- Banerjee, 2014, Improvement of human keratinocyte migration by a redox active bioelectric dressing., PLoS One, 9, e89239, 10.1371/journal.pone.0089239 · DOI
- Ghatak, 2015, A wireless electroceutical dressing lowers cost of negative pressure wound therapy., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 302, 10.1089/wound.2014.0615 · DOI
- Kim, 2014, Antibacterial efficacy testing of a bioelectric wound dressing against clinical wound pathogens., Open Microbiol J, 8, 15, 10.2174/1874285801408010015 · DOI
- Kim, 2016, An overview of the efficacy of a next generation electroceutical wound care device., Mil Med, 181, 184, 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00157 · DOI
- Roy, 2019, Disposable patterned electroceutical dressing (PED-10) is safe for treatment of open clinical chronic wounds., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 8, 149, 10.1089/wound.2018.0915 · DOI
- Dusane, 2019, Electroceutical treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms., Sci Rep, 9, 2008, 10.1038/s41598-018-37891-y · DOI
- Sultana, 2015, Electrochemical scaffold generates localized, low concentration of hydrogen peroxide that inhibits bacterial pathogens and biofilms., Sci Rep, 5, 14908, 10.1038/srep14908 · DOI
- Sultana, 2016, Maltodextrin enhances biofilm elimination by electrochemical scaffold., Sci Rep, 6, 36003, 10.1038/srep36003 · DOI
- Burrowes, 2011, Bacteriophage therapy: Potential uses in the control of antibiotic-resistant pathogens., Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 9, 775, 10.1586/eri.11.90 · DOI
- Shlezinger, 2017, Phage therapy: A new horizon in the antibacterial treatment of oral pathogens., Curr Top Med Chem, 17, 1199, 10.2174/1568026616666160930145649 · DOI
- Bollyky, 2019, The innate sense of bacteriophages., Cell Host Microbe, 25, 177, 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.020 · DOI
- Secor, 2016, Filamentous bacteriophage produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa alters the inflammatory response and promotes noninvasive infection in vivo., Infect Immun, 85, e00648
- Sweere, 2019, Bacteriophage trigger antiviral immunity and prevent clearance of bacterial infection., Science, 363, eaat9691, 10.1126/science.aat9691 · DOI
- Pires, 2017, Phage therapy as an alternative or complementary strategy to prevent and control biofilm-related infections., Curr Opin Microbiol, 39, 48, 10.1016/j.mib.2017.09.004 · DOI
- Packer, 2017, Phage-assisted continuous evolution of proteases with altered substrate specificity., Nat Commun, 8, 956, 10.1038/s41467-017-01055-9 · DOI
- Santos, 2018, Exploiting bacteriophage proteomes: The hidden biotechnological potential., Trends Biotechnol, 36, 966, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.04.006 · DOI
- Young, 2014, Phage lysis: Three steps, three choices, one outcome., J Microbiol, 52, 243, 10.1007/s12275-014-4087-z · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singh, S., Muniz De Oliveira, F., Wang, C., Kumar, M., Xuan, Y., DeMazumder, D., Sen, C. K., & Roy, S. (2025) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2024.0291 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sen, C. K., Roy, S., Mathew-Steiner, S. S., & Gordillo, G. M.
- Venue
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2021-07-27
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275e-288e
- ISSN
- 0032-1052
- PMC
- PMC8439557
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm Management in Wound Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/prs.0000000000008142
- The paper
- Sen, C. K., Roy, S., Mathew-Steiner, S. S., & Gordillo, G. M. (2021). Biofilm Management in Wound Care. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000008142