Cited by 1,904Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Cognitive Reappraisal of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Human Neuroimaging Studies

Open access
Buhle, J. T., Silvers, J. A., Wager, T. D., Lopez, R., Onyemekwu, C., Kober, H., Weber, J., Ochsner, K. N.·2014·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

In recent years, an explosion of neuroimaging studies has examined cognitive reappraisal, an emotion regulation strategy that involves changing the way one thinks about a stimulus in order to change its affective impact. Existing models broadly agree that reappraisal recruits frontal and parietal control regions to modulate emotional responding in the amygdala, but they offer competing visions of how this is accomplished. One view holds that control regions engage ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), an area associated with fear extinction, that in turn modulates amygdala responses. An alternative view is that control regions modulate semantic representations in lateral temporal cortex that indirectly influence emotion-related responses in the amygdala. Furthermore, while previous work has emphasized the amygdala, whether reappraisal influences other regions implicated in emotional responding remains unknown. To resolve these questions, we performed a meta-analysis of 48 neuroimaging studies of reappraisal, most involving downregulation of negative affect. Reappraisal consistently 1) activated cognitive control regions and lateral temporal cortex, but not vmPFC, and 2) modulated the bilateral amygdala, but no other brain regions. This suggests that reappraisal involves the use of cognitive control to modulate semantic representations of an emotional stimulus, and these altered representations in turn attenuate activity in the amygdala.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bht154

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

2 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

12 of 35 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    Reappraisal does not rely on vmPFC-mediated emotional control.

    “However, in contrast to several prominent theories, the present results indicate that reappraisal does not rely on vmPFCmediated emotional control (Ochsner andGross 2005, 2007;Schiller and Delgado 2010;Diekhof et al. 2011;Etkin et al. 2011), but instead may act though the lateral temporal cortex, an area associated with semantic and perceptual representation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ochsner andGross 2005, 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Schiller and Delgado 2010 source

      In “A general neural mechanism for changing fear” (page unavailable), the review reports increased vmPFC responses when fear is regulated with cognitive strategies and suggests that dlPFC regulation may act through vmPFC connections. The citing sentence presents the absence of vmPFC-mediated control as its own result, in contrast to the theories it cites; Schiller and Delgado support the contrasting view, not that result. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Diekhof et al. 2011 source
    • Rests on an assumption: Absence of vmPFC activation in the meta-analysis indicates that reappraisal does not rely on vmPFC-mediated emotional control.
  • Interpretationown data

    The null finding of no consistent vmPFC recruitment contradicts the hypothesis that vmPFC provides a necessary link by which frontal and parietal regions modulate emotion-related activity in the amygdala.

    “This null finding contradicts the hypothesis that vmPFC provides a necessary link by which frontal and parietal regions modulate emotion-related activity in the amygdala (Ochsner andGross 2005, 2007;Schiller and Delgado 2010;Diekhof et al. 2011;Etkin et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ochsner andGross 2005, 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Schiller and Delgado 2010 source

      In “A general neural mechanism for changing fear” (page not provided), the review proposes that dlPFC might affect the amygdala indirectly through vmPFC connections. It does not establish vmPFC as a necessary link or extend that proposed pathway to parietal regions. The citing authors’ null finding is their own result, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Diekhof et al. 2011 source
  • Premisecitation

    More studies have recently attempted to examine reappraisal of phobogenic stimuli in phobic populations or social stimuli in populations characterized by unstable social relationships, such as borderline personality disorder.

    “More studies have attempted to do this recently with work examining reappraisal of phobogenic stimuli in phobic populations (Hermann et al. 2009) or social stimuli in populations characterized by unstable social relationships, such as borderline personality disorder (Koenigsberg et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hermann et al. 2009 source
    • cites Koenigsberg et al. 2009 source
  • Premisecitation

    The ventral striatum responds both to positive and negative stimuli.

    “Although the ventral striatum is involved in reward, prior research has shown that the ventral striatum responds both to positive and negative stimuli (Roitman et al. 2005) and that stimulation of this region can result in both approach and avoidance (Reynolds and Berridge 2001, 2002, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roitman et al. 2005 source
  • Findingcitation

    The implementation of reappraisal consistently activated domain-general cognitive control regions, including dmPFC, dlPFC, vlPFC, and posterior parietal lobe.

    “In line with existing models, the implementation of reappraisal consistently activated domain-general cognitive control regions, including dmPFC, dlPFC, vlPFC, and posterior parietal lobe (Ochsner andGross 2005, 2008;Kalisch 2009;Schiller and Delgado 2010;Diekhof et al. 2011;Ochsner et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ochsner andGross 2005, 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kalisch 2009 source
    • cites Schiller and Delgado 2010 source

      The “Regulation of fear” section reports increased dlPFC activity during reappraisal and identifies the dlPFC with cognitive control. It does not identify dmPFC, vlPFC, or the posterior parietal lobe as consistently activated by reappraisal; it notes that the specific prefrontal areas recruited vary across studies. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 4
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many other regions are involved in emotion, including ventral striatum, insula, and brainstem regions such as periaqueductal gray.

    “However, many other regions are involved in emotion (Kober et al. 2008;Vytal and Hamann 2010;Lindquist et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kober et al. 2008 source
    • cites Vytal and Hamann 2010 source
    • cites Lindquist et al. 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Animal and human work show that vmPFC is critical for fear extinction and reversal learning.

    “Second, animal and human work show that vmPFC is critical for fear extinction and reversal learning (Milad et al. 2007;Finger et al. 2008;Schiller et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Milad et al. 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Finger et al. 2008 source

      The Discussion reports medial orbitofrontal activity during human operant extinction, while the paper describes animal and human evidence linking medial prefrontal regions to fear-extinction recall and medial orbitofrontal regions to reversal learning (page numbers unavailable). It does not establish that vmPFC is critical for both fear extinction and reversal learning: its own experiment tested operant extinction, and it describes the fear and reversal findings more cautiously. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Schiller et al. 2008 source

      In “Reversal of fear” (page unavailable), the paper reports vmPFC activation during human fear reversal. In “Fear reversal versus fear extinction” (page unavailable), it relates that response to extinction findings, but proposes possible roles for the vmPFC rather than establishing that it is critical to either process. This study does not itself provide animal evidence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The present results are consistent with the hypotheses that dlPFC may support manipulation of appraisals in working memory, vlPFC may support selection and inhibition of appraisals, and dmPFC may support semantic and self-reflective processes relevant to elaborating the affective meaning of stimuli or perceiving one's affective state.

    “Specifically, the present results are consistent with the hypotheses that dlPFC may support manipulation of appraisals in working memory (Wager and Smith 2003), vlPFC may support selection and inhibition of appraisals (Robbins 2007;Simmonds et al. 2008), and dmPFC may support semantic and self-reflective processes relevant to elaborating the affective meaning of stimuli or perceiving one's affect”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wager and Smith 2003 source
    • cites Robbins 2007 source

      Split into 3 atoms — 0 confirmed, 3 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Simmonds et al. 2008 source

      Split into 3 atoms — 0 confirmed, 3 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Amygdala responses track affective intensity, especially for aversive stimuli like those photos used widely in reappraisal studies.

    “Furthermore, prior work shows that amygdala responses track affective intensity, especially for aversive stimuli like those photos used widely in reappraisal studies (Canli et al. 2000;Williams et al. 2001;Anderson et al. 2003;Cunningham et al. 2004;Ochsner et al. 2004Ochsner et al. , 2009;;Phan et al. 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Canli et al. 2000 source

      The Results report that bilateral amygdala activation correlated with participants’ ratings of emotional intensity, and the Methods describe the stimuli as negative-to-neutral pictures. The Discussion says the study could not separate arousal from negative valence; it therefore does not establish that responses track intensity especially for aversive stimuli. The paper also does not establish how widely these photos are used in reappraisal studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Williams et al. 2001 source
    • cites Anderson et al. 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Reappraisal modulated bilateral amygdala clusters, with the left cluster extending into the ventral striatum and pallidum.

    “The analysis revealed bilateral amygdala clusters, with the left cluster extending into the ventral striatum and pallidum (Table 3; Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Reappraisal consistently activated cognitive control regions including posterior dmPFC and bilateral dlPFC, vlPFC, and posterior parietal cortex.

    “As expected, this revealed extensive recruitment of regions commonly observed in cognitive control tasks including posterior dmPFC and bilateral dlPFC, vlPFC, and posterior parietal cortex (Table 2; Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Reappraisal consistently activated left posterior temporal cortex.

    “Second, a sizeable cluster was observed in left posterior temporal cortex.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Reappraisal did not modulate any brain regions other than the bilateral amygdala.

    “No clusters were observed anywhere else in the brain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Reappraisal did not consistently activate vmPFC.

    “First, we failed to observe any clusters in vmPFC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of 48 studies in the present meta-analysis, 34 used aversive stimuli, 5 used positive/appetitive stimuli, and 9 used both.

    “(of 48 studies in the present meta-analysis, 34 used aversive stimuli, 5 used positive/appetitive stimuli, and 9 used both; see Table 1 for a summary)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The results of the second meta-analysis including only downregulation contrasts were nearly identical, suggesting consistent prefrontal, parietal, and temporal regions are recruited by reappraisal regardless of whether one is reappraising to increase or decrease affective responses.

    “The results of this analysis were nearly identical, suggesting consistent prefrontal, parietal, and temporal regions are consistently recruited by reappraisal, regardless of whether one is reappraising to increase or decrease affective responses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only 4 studies have examined reappraisal in the domain of decision-making; within those 4 studies, 2 examined reappraisal at the time of decision-making, another examined reappraisal during anticipation of monetary reward, and another examined reappraisal during both anticipation and receipt of monetary reward.

    “Yet, testing this hypothesis is virtually impossible at present given that only 4 studies have examined reappraisal in the domain of decisionmaking and within those 4 studies, 2 examined reappraisal at the time of decision-making (Grecucci, Giorgetta, Van't Wout et al. 2012;Sokol-Hessner et al. 2012), another examined reappraisal during anticipation of monetary reward (Staudinger et al. 2011), and”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No change was observed in other regions related to emotional responding, or anywhere else in the brain, during reappraisal.

    “Lastly, reappraisal was consistently associated with bilateral amygdala modulation, but no change was observed in other regions related to emotional responding, or anywhere else in the brain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Psychological models of reappraisal suggest that many of the same cognitive control processes used to regulate attention, memory and thoughts in nonemotional contexts are also used in the cognitive regulation of emotion.

    “Psychological models of reappraisal suggest that that many of the same cognitive control processes that are used to regulate attention, memory and thoughts in nonemotional contexts are also used in the cognitive regulation of emotion (Ochsner and Gross 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ochsner and Gross 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reappraisal is highly effective at regulating affect and physiological arousal without the cognitive and physiological costs associated with response-focused strategies, and with longer-lasting effects than attention-focused strategies.

    “One reason this strategy is so well studied is because reappraisal is highly effective at regulating affect and physiological arousal without the cognitive and physiological costs associated with response-focused strategies (e.g., expressive suppression) (Gross 1998), and with longerlasting effects than attention-focused strategies (e.g., distraction) (Ochsner and Gross 2005;Kross and Ayduk 2008;O”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gross 1998 source
    • cites Ochsner and Gross 2005 source
    • cites Kross and Ayduk 2008 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Extensive work in animals and humans has implicated the amygdala in the detection, encoding, and organization of responses to arousing, goal-relevant stimuli.

    “Extensive work in animals and humans has implicated the amygdala in the detection, encoding, and organization of responses to arousing, goal-relevant stimuli (Anderson et al. 2003;Phelps and LeDoux 2005;Cunningham and Brosch 2012;Wilson-Mendenhall et al. forthcoming).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Anderson et al. 2003 source
    • cites Phelps and LeDoux 2005 source
    • cites Cunningham and Brosch 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The meta-analysis could not directly compare the neural bases of reappraisal for positive and negative stimuli because only 14 studies used positive stimuli, which would have rendered such a comparison underpowered.

    “In either case, a direct comparison between the neural bases of reappraisal for positive and negative stimuli in the present analysis was not possible because the relatively scant number (14) of studies using positive stimuli would have rendered such a comparison underpowered.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The study of Diekhof and coworkers included far fewer studies and thus would be more prone to false positives than the present meta-analysis.

    “First, the study of Diekhof and coworkers included far fewer studies and thus would be more prone to false positives than the present meta-analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reappraisal involves the use of cognitive control to modulate semantic representations of an emotional stimulus, and these altered representations in turn attenuate activity in the amygdala.

    “This suggests that reappraisal involves the use of cognitive control to modulate semantic representations of an emotional stimulus, and these altered representations in turn attenuate activity in the amygdala.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of involvement of vmPFC in reappraisal suggests that while reappraisal may lead to a similar outcome as extinction, there are likely notable differences in the psychological and neural processes that lead to this outcome.

    “The lack of involvement of vmPFC in reappraisal suggests that while reappraisal may lead to a similar outcome as extinction (i.e., cue-related emotional activity is reduced), there are likely notable differences in the psychological and neural processes that lead to this outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Current models of emotion suggest that emotional responses are reflected in activity across a network of regions.

    “Current models of emotion suggest that emotional responses are reflected in activity across a network of regions (Kober et al. 2008), and in changing one's emotional response one might expect reappraisal to affect this network as a whole.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kober et al. 2008 source
21 of 21
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The influence of reappraisal on brain regions other than the amygdala implicated in emotional responding was unknown prior to this meta-analysis.

    “Furthermore, while previous work has emphasized the amygdala, whether reappraisal influences other regions implicated in emotional responding remains unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Main effect contrasts comparing reappraisal to a baseline condition are the most commonly reported type of contrast in reappraisal manuscripts.

    “This is the most commonly reported type of contrast in reappraisal manuscripts, and it offers the most straightforward way to identify the neural regions that support reappraisal.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The lateral temporal cortex is associated with semantic and perceptual representation.

    “but instead may act though the lateral temporal cortex, an area associated with semantic and perceptual representation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Absence of vmPFC activation in the meta-analysis indicates that reappraisal does not rely on vmPFC-mediated emotional control.

    “the present results indicate that reappraisal does not rely on vmPFCmediated emotional control”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive reappraisal is considered more effective than suppression or avoidance and has been proposed as a mechanism of CBT and mindfulness-based therapies.

    “Cognitive reappraisal is considered more effective than inhibitory strategies that involve suppression or avoidance (Aldao et al., 2010; Webb et al., 2012) and has been proposed as an underlying mechanism of cognitive-behavioral (CBT) and mindfulness-based therapies (Buhle et al., 2014; Sheppes et al., 2014; Teasdale et al., 2002).”

    From Prospective examination of the therapeutic role of psychological flexibility and cognitive reappraisal in the ceremonial use of ayahuasca (2022) · cites this paper as Buhle et al., 2014

    The Introduction (page not provided) says that core elements of reappraisal are central to cognitive behavioral therapy, supporting the CBT portion of the clause attributed to Buhle et al. The paper does not identify mindfulness-based therapies or propose reappraisal as their underlying mechanism. The comparison with suppression or avoidance is cited to other sources in the sentence, not to Buhle et al. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The limited data presented thus far suggest that acceptance-associated emotion-regulation strategies may produce brain responses that overlap with well-documented reappraisal brain networks.

    “The limited data presented thus far suggest that acceptanceassociated emotion-regulation strategies may produce brain responses that overlap with well-documented reappraisal brain networks.25”

    From Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Mindfulness Meditation in Brain Changes During Reappraisal and Acceptance Among Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results and Discussion identify brain regions consistently recruited during reappraisal, including dmPFC, dlPFC, vlPFC, and posterior parietal cortex (page unavailable in our copy). The cited paper does not report brain responses to acceptance-associated strategies or compare them with reappraisal, so it does not support the proposed overlap. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The finding of increased dACC/dmPFC activation associated with emotion acceptance relative to worry or suppression aligns somewhat with findings for cognitive reappraisal, which have shown a strong correlation between dACC activation during reappraisal and reductions in distress ratings.

    “The finding of increased dACC/dmPFC activation associated with emotion acceptance relative to worry or suppression also aligns somewhat with findings for cognitive reappraisal, which have shown a strong correlation between dACC activation during reappraisal and reductions in distress ratings, indicating reappraisal success (Berkman and Lieberman, 2009; Buhle et al., 2014).”

    From Neural correlates of emotion acceptance<i>vs</i>worry or suppression in generalized anxiety disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Buhle et al., 2014

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing studies of cognitive reappraisal implicate DLPFC, VLPFC and dmPFC activation, coupled with decreased medial orbitofrontal and amygdala activation.

    “Existing studies of cognitive reappraisal additionally implicate DLPFC, VLPFC and dmPFC activation, coupled with decreased medial orbitofrontal and amygdala activation (Ochsner et al., 2002; Goldin et al., 2008; Buhle et al., 2014).”

    From Neural correlates of emotion acceptance<i>vs</i>worry or suppression in generalized anxiety disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Buhle et al., 2014

    The Results (page unavailable) report increased dmPFC, dlPFC and vlPFC activity during reappraisal, alongside decreased bilateral amygdala activity. They found no other clusters of decreased activity, and the Discussion specifically says orbitofrontal cortex was not reliably modulated. Thus the claimed decrease in medial orbitofrontal activation is not supported by this meta-analysis. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cognitive reappraisal tasks modulate processing of emotional stimuli in amygdala and ventral striatum.

    “Cognitive reappraisal tasks have been found to modulate the processing of emotional stimuli in regions such as amygdala and the ventral striatum (Buhle et al., 2014).”

    From Top-Down Dysregulation—From ADHD to Emotional Instability (2016) · cites this paper as Buhle et al., 2014

    The Results report reduced activation during reappraisal in bilateral amygdala clusters, with the left cluster extending into the ventral striatum. They found no separate cluster elsewhere, and the Discussion treats ventral-striatal modulation as a possibility rather than a consistent finding. The claim therefore overstates the evidence for the ventral striatum. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value: χ 2 (1, N = 33) = 3.417, p = .07

    Minor

    The paper reports p = .07 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .065. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .07 · recomputed p = .065

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upχ²(1) = 3.417reported p = .07 · recomputed p = .065

    “χ 2 (1, N = 33) = 3.417, p = .07”

  • Consistentχ²(1) = 5.215reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .022

    “χ 2 (1, N = 33) = 5.215, p < .05”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 133 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 2012, Cerebral Cortex, 23, 739
  2. Fusar-Poli, 2009, Journal of psychiatry &amp; neuroscience : JPN, 34, 418
  3. 2012, 3, 616
  4. 2012, Cerebral Cortex, 23, 399
  5. 2008, GROUP PROCESS INTERGR RELAT, 11, 145
  6. Reynolds, 2002, Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 7308
  7. 2012, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 341

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buhle, J. T., Silvers, J. A., Wager, T. D., Lopez, R., Onyemekwu, C., Kober, H., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. N.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2013-06-13
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
2981-2990
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2136449688
Cited by
1,896
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 160 · 2025: 152 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 156 · 2021: 189 · 2020: 216 · 2019: 151 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 126 · 2016: 113 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0631637)
  • National Institutes of Health (MH076136)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076137, MH094056, F31MH094056, R01MH076136)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022541, RC1DA028608, R01DA027794, K12DA000167)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD069178)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation, amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, lateral temporal cortex, semantic representation, negative affect, fear extinction, emotional responses
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, PubMed, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review