Cited by 93Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCardiac Health and Mental Health

Optimism in Relation to Inflammation and Endothelial Dysfunction in Older Men: The VA Normative Aging Study

Ikeda, Ai, Schwartz, Joel, Peters, Junenette L., Fang, Shona, Spiro, Avron, Sparrow, David, Vokonas, Pantel, Kubzansky, Laura D.·2011·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Background Recent research suggests that optimism may reduce the risk of incident cardiovascular disease, but the mechanisms have not been determined. This study examines the association of optimism with change in inflammation and endothelial function over time in men. Methods Longitudinal data were obtained from the Normative Aging Study excluding men with preexisting coronary heart disease or active infection at the time optimism was assessed (n = 340; mean [standard deviation] age = 70.9 [6.7] years). The Life Orientation Test was used to measure optimism, and serum markers were used to measure inflammation and endothelial dysfunction and were obtained repeatedly during the course of the study (1999-2008). These markers included high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II. Within this sample, 243 men (71%) had two or more repeated measures of each outcome, resulting in a total of 746 observations for analysis. Linear mixed-effects models with a random subject intercept were used to estimate associations. Results Higher overall optimism scores were associated with lower levels of interleukin 6 and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 pooled across multiple time points in multivariable models but were not associated with rate of change in these markers over time. Analyses considering separate effects of optimism and pessimism subsca…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0b013e3182312497

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ikeda, A., Schwartz, J., Peters, J. L., Fang, S., Spiro, A., Sparrow, D., Vokonas, P., & Kubzansky, L. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Kubzansky, Laura D.
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2011-10
Volume
73
Issue
8
Pages
664-671
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048681865
Cited by
93
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG018436, R01AG013006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
optimism, pessimism, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, older men, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II, cardiovascular risk, Life Orientation Test, aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Endothelium, Vascular, Humans, Inflammation, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review