Cited by 80Nutritional Studies and DietOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingNutrition, Genetics, and Disease

Optimism and Diet Quality in the Women's Health Initiative

Open access
Hingle, Melanie D., Wertheim, Betsy C., Tindle, Hilary A., Tinker, Lesley, Seguin, Rebecca A., Rosal, Milagros C., Thomson, Cynthia A.·2014·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Diet quality has not been well studied in relation to positive psychological traits. Our purpose was to investigate the relationship between optimism and diet quality in postmenopausal women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative observational study (OS) and clinical trials (CTs), and to determine whether optimism was associated with diet change after a 1-year dietary intervention. Diet quality was scored with the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and optimism assessed with the Life Orientation Test-Revised. Baseline characteristics were compared across AHEI quintiles or optimism tertiles using regression models with each variable of interest as a function of quintiles or tertiles (OS, n=87,630; CT, n=65,360). Association between optimism and baseline AHEI and change in AHEI over 1 year were tested using multivariate linear regression (CT, n=13,645). Potential interaction between optimism and trial arm and demographic/lifestyle factors on AHEI change was tested using likelihood ratio test (CT intervention, n=13,645; CT control, n=20,242). Women reporting high AHEI were non-Hispanic white, educated, physically active, past or never smokers, hormone therapy users, had lower body mass index and waist circumference, and were less likely to have chronic conditions. In the CT intervention, higher optimism was associated with higher AHEI at baseline and with greater change over 1 year (P=0.001). Effect modification by intervention status was observed (P=0.014), whereas control participants with highest optimism achieved threefold greater AHEI increase compared with those with the lowest optimism. These data support a relationship between optimism and dietary quality score in postmenopausal women at baseline and over 1 year.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.018

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hingle, M. D., Wertheim, B. C., Tindle, H. A., Tinker, L., Seguin, R. A., Rosal, M. C., & Thomson, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Hingle, Melanie D.
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
114
Issue
7
Pages
1036-1045
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052923963
Cited by
80
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHSN268201100002C, HHSN2682011 00003C, HHSN 268201100001C, HHSN268201100046C, HHSN268201100004C, HHSN-271-2011-00004C)
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN268201100004C, n01wh32115-26-0-1, HHSN268201100046C, HHSN271201100004C, HHSN268201100001C, HHSN268201100002C, HHSN268201100003C, N01 WH032115)
  • National Institute on Aging (HHSN-271-2011-00004C,)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN2682011-00001I, HHSN2682011-00002I, HHSN268201100004C, K01HL108807, HHSN271201100004C, HHSN2682011‐00004I, HHSN26820-1100002C, HHSN268201100046C, HHSN268201100001C, HHSN2682011-00003I, HHSN268201100003C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
optimism, diet quality, Alternative Healthy Eating Index, postmenopausal women, dietary intervention, Life Orientation Test-Revised, effect modification, Women's Health Initiative
MeSH terms
Aged, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Women's Health, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review