Cited by 27Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionSchizophrenia research and treatmentOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Positive mental health in schizophrenia and healthy comparison groups: relationships with overall health and biomarkers

Open access
Edmonds, Emily C., Martin, Averria Sirkin, Palmer, Barton W., Eyler, Lisa T., Rana, Brinda K., Jeste, Dilip V.·2018·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Positive psychological factors (PPFs) have been reported to have a significant impact on health in the general population. However, little is known about the relationship of these factors with mental and physical health in schizophrenia. METHOD: One hundred and thirty-five outpatients with schizophrenia and 127 healthy comparison subjects (HCs), aged 26-65 years, were evaluated with scales of resilience, optimism, happiness, and perceived stress. Measures of mental and physical health were also obtained. Regression analyses examined associations of a PPF composite with health variables. RESULTS: Relative to the HCs, the schizophrenia group had lower levels of PPFs. However, there was considerable heterogeneity, with over one-third of schizophrenia participants having values within the 'normative' range. The PPF composite was positively related to mental and physical health variables and with biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance. The relationship between PPFs and mental health was particularly strong for individuals with schizophrenia. CONCLUSION: A sizable minority of adults with chronic schizophrenia have levels of resilience, optimism, happiness, and perceived stress similar to HCs. Psychosocial interventions to enhance PPFs should be tested in patients with serious mental illnesses, with the goal of improving their mental health (beyond controlling symptoms of psychosis) and their physical health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2016.1251572

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Derogatis, L., 1979. Brief severity index (BSI). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson, Inc.
  2. First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., & Gibbon, M. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, reserach version, patient edition (SCID-I/P). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research.
  3. Jeste, D.V., Palmer, B.W., Rettew, D.C., & Boardman, S. (2015). Positive psy- chiatry: Its time has come. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 76(6), 478- 683.
  4. Martin, A.S., Harmell, A.L., & Mausbach, B.T. (2015). Positive psychological traits. In D.V. Jeste & B.W. Palmer (Eds.), Positive psychiatry: A clinical handbook (pp. 19-43). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  5. Moore, R.C., Eyler, L.T., Mills, P.J., O'Hara, R.M., Wachmann, K., & Laveretsky, H. (2015). Biology of positive psychiatry. In D.V. Jeste & B.W. Palmer (Eds.), Positive psychiatry: A clinical handbook (pp. 261-284). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  6. Sheehan, D.V., Lecrubier, Y., Harnett-Sheehan, K., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., … Dunbar, G. (1998). The mini international neuropsychiat- ric interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(20), 22-33.
  7. Summers, R.F., & Lord, J.A. (2015). Positivity in supportive and psychody- namic therapy. In D.V. Jeste & B.W. Palmer (Eds.), Positive psychiatry: A clinical handbook (pp. 167-192). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edmonds, E. C., Martin, A. S., Palmer, B. W., Eyler, L. T., Rana, B. K., & Jeste, D. V.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Edmonds, Emily C.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2016-11-11
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
354-362
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2552244650
Cited by
27
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01 MH094151-01)
  • NIMH T32 Geriatric Mental Health Program (MH019934)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
schizophrenia, positive mental health, positive psychological factors, resilience, optimism, happiness, perceived stress, mental health, physical health, biomarkers, inflammation, insulin resistance, psychosocial interventions, severe mental illness
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review