Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative Non-Gaussian Diffusion and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions

Iima, Mami, Yano, Kojiro, Kataoka, Masako, Umehana, Masaki, Murata, Katsutoshi, Kanao, Shotaro, Togashi, Kaori, Le Bihan, Denis·2015·Investigative Radiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore the potential of non-Gaussian diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI for the diagnosis of breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 26 women with breast lesions. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired using 16 b values up to 2500 s/mm and analyzed using a kurtosis diffusion model (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC0] and kurtosis [K]) for the diffusion component and IVIM model (perfusion fraction [fIVIM] and pseudodiffusion coefficient [D*]) for the perfusion component. Diagnostic performance of diffusion and perfusion parameters was evaluated from receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: The ADC0 in malignant lesions was significantly lower than that in benign lesions and normal tissue (P < 0.001, P < 0.001), whereas K was significantly higher (P < 0.05, P < 0.001), as well as fIVIM (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). No significant difference was found in D*. The receiver operating characteristic analysis gave high area under the curve values for ADC0, K, and fIVIM for distinguishing malignant from benign lesions (0.99, 0.85, and 0.82, respectively). The ADC0 allowed benign tumors to be identified with 100% negative predictive value and malignant tumors with 100% sensitivity. The malignant/benign diagnosis thresholds were 1.4 × 10 mm/s as well as 0.6 and 7%, respectively, for ADC0, K, and fIVIM. CONCLUSIONS: With a proper methodological framework, IVIM MRI can provide valuable information on tissue structure and microvasculature beneficial for the diagnosis of breast cancer lesions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/rli.0000000000000094

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Iima, M., Yano, K., Kataoka, M., Umehana, M., Murata, K., Kanao, S., Togashi, K., & Le Bihan, D.
Venue
Investigative Radiology
Published
2015-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
205-211
ISSN
0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049806363
Cited by
189
References
5
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Non-Gaussian Diffusion and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/rli.0000000000000094
The paper
Iima, M., Yano, K., Kataoka, M., Umehana, M., Murata, K., Kanao, S., Togashi, K., & Le Bihan, D. (2015). Quantitative Non-Gaussian Diffusion and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. Investigative Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0000000000000094

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.