Cited by 8Congenital Heart Disease StudiesGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of cardiovascular anomalies associated with Turner syndrome

Sigakis, Christopher J.G., Browne, Lorna P., Bang, Tami, Khanna, Amber, Pruente, Ryan, Vargas, Daniel·2019·Journal of Thoracic Imaging

Abstract

Cardiovascular imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of congenital and acquired cardiovascular disease in patients with Turner syndrome. Cardiovascular defects in this population may affect a single component of the cardiovascular system or exist in combination with other anomalies, and, they may present early in life or remain occult into adulthood. Careful screening and surveillance imaging are necessary for the early detection and management of cardiovascular defects, especially in cases wherein early intervention may be necessary to prevent a serious cardiovascular outcome. It is critical that these patients are followed-up by specialists aware of their unique cardiovascular risk factors and that imaging examinations are interpreted by cardiovascular imagers familiar with the variety of anomalies that may be present and/or warrant imaging follow-up. Herein, we review common and uncommon cardiovascular anomalies associated with Turner syndrome and provide an image-based approach to analyzing key cardiothoracic findings that should be assessed in this patient population. Current imaging recommendations and guidelines for various anomalies will also be reviewed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/rti.0000000000000372

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Venous anomalies (anomalous pulmonary veins, left superior vena cava) are more common in TS.

    “While venous anomalies (anomalous pulmonary veins, left superior vena cava) are more common in TS, the question remains if malformations of the inferior vena cava or pelvic veins increase the risk for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities.395,475”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sigakis, C. J. G., Browne, L. P., Bang, T., Khanna, A., Pruente, R., & Vargas, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Radiology, Columbus Radiology/Radiology Partners, Columbus, OH
  • Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
  • Radiology
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Sigakis, Christopher J.G.
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Published
2019-05
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
W23-W35
ISSN
0883-5993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898737648
Cited by
8
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
Turner syndrome, cardiovascular anomalies, congenital heart disease, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, cardiovascular screening, surveillance imaging, image interpretation, cardiovascular risk factors, imaging guidelines
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular System, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Turner Syndrome, Cardiovascular Abnormalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review