Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Nutritional Index, Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Okadome, Kazuo, Baba, Yoshifumi, Yagi, Taisuke, Kiyozumi, Yuki, Ishimoto, Takatsugu, Iwatsuki, Masaaki, Miyamoto, Yuji, Yoshida, Naoya, Watanabe, Masayuki, Baba, Hideo·2020·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether prognostic nutritional index (PNI) affects clinical outcome through local immunity in esophageal cancers. Background: PNI is an indicator of nutritional status and systemic immune competence, and has attracted attention as a prognostic biomarker. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a specific histological feature of human cancers, reflecting an individual's immunological tumor response. Methods: Using a nonbiased database of 337 curatively resected esophageal cancers, we evaluated the relationship between PNI, TILs status, CD8 expression by immunohistochemical staining, and clinical outcome. Results: Compared with PNI-high cases (n = 220), PNI-low cases (n = 117) showed significantly worse overall survival (log-rank P < 0.001; hazard ratio: 2.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.56–3.18; P < 0.001; multivariate hazard ratio: 1.67; 95% confidence interval: 1.14–2.44; P = 0.008). The TILs status was also significantly correlated with overall survival (P < 0.001). In addition, PNI was significantly associated with TILs status (P < 0.001) and the CD8-positive cell count (P = 0.041). A significant relationship between the peripheral blood lymphocyte count and TILs status was also observed (P < 0.001). Conclusions: PNI and TILs score expression were associated with clinical outcome in esophageal cancer, supporting their roles as prognostic biomarkers. Considering the relationship between PNI and TILs, nutritional status and systemic immune competence may influence patient prognosis through local immune response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0000000000002985

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Okadome, K., Baba, Y., Yagi, T., Kiyozumi, Y., Ishimoto, T., Iwatsuki, M., Miyamoto, Y., Yoshida, N., Watanabe, M., & Baba, H.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2020-04
Volume
271
Issue
4
Pages
693-700
ISSN
  • 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1140
OpenAlex
W2896559554
Cited by
391
References
36
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Nutritional Index, Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0000000000002985
The paper
Okadome, K., Baba, Y., Yagi, T., Kiyozumi, Y., Ishimoto, T., Iwatsuki, M., Miyamoto, Y., Yoshida, N., Watanabe, M., & Baba, H. (2020). Prognostic Nutritional Index, Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.