Cited by 746Frailty in Older AdultsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques

Gait Speed as an Incremental Predictor of Mortality and Major Morbidity in Elderly Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Open access
Afilalo, Jonathan, Eisenberg, Mark J., Morin, Jean-François, Bergman, Howard, Monette, Johanne, Noiseux, Nicolas, Perrault, Louis P., Alexander, Karen P. +7 more·2010·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to test the value of gait speed, a clinical marker for frailty, to improve the prediction of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Background It is increasingly difficult to predict the elderly patient's risk posed by cardiac surgery because existing risk assessment tools are incomplete.Methods A multicenter prospective cohort of elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery was assembled at 4 tertiary care hospitals between 2008 and 2009. Patients were eligible if they were 70 years of age or older and were scheduled for coronary artery bypass and/or valve replacement or repair. The primary predictor was slow gait speed, defined as a time taken to walk 5 m of ≥ 6 s. The primary end point was a composite of in-hospital post-operative mortality or major morbidity.Results The cohort consisted of 131 patients with a mean age of 75.8 ± 4.4 years; 34% were female patients. Sixty patients (46%) were classified as slow walkers before cardiac surgery. Slow walkers were more likely to be female (43% vs. 25%, p = 0.03) and diabetic (50% vs. 28%, p = 0.01). Thirty patients (23%) experienced the primary composite end point of mortality or major morbidity after cardiac surgery. Slow gait speed was an independent predictor of the composite end point after adjusting for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score (odds ratio: 3.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.23 to 7.54).Conclusions Gait speed is a simple and effective test that may identify a subset of vulnerable elderly patients at incrementally higher risk of mortality and major morbidity after cardiac surgery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.039

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tu JV, Sykora K, Naylor CD. Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1317-23.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Afilalo, J., Eisenberg, M. J., Morin, J.-F., Bergman, H., Monette, J., Noiseux, N., Perrault, L. P., Alexander, K. P., Langlois, Y., Dendukuri, N., Chamoun, P., Kasparian, G., Robichaud, S., Gharacholou, S. M., & Boivin, J.-F.
Affiliations
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
  • Hôtel-Dieu de Montréal (CA)
  • Montreal Heart Institute (CA)
  • Duke University (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Afilalo, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
56
Issue
20
Pages
1668-1676
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968963305
Cited by
746
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 41
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Jewish General Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Keywords
walking speed, frailty, elderly patients, cardiac surgery, postoperative mortality, major morbidity, risk prediction, coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement, Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score, preoperative assessment
MeSH terms
Aged, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gait, Heart Diseases, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Male, Morbidity, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Quebec, United States, Survival Rate, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review