Cited by 18Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchCancer survivorship and care

The role of psychological support interventions in trauma patients on mental health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pham, Christopher H., Fang, Mike, Nager, Jacqueline, Matsushima, Kazuhide, Inaba, Kenji, Kuza, Catherine M.·2019·Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recovery and rehabilitation of trauma survivors may be long and challenging. Patients may be prone to psychiatric disorders, cognitive impairments, and decreased quality of life. The objective of this review was to determine whether there is a role for psychological interventions in reducing the incidence and severity of psychiatric sequelae in trauma survivors. METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar were searched for published articles. We searched for articles published between 1990 and 2018 with adult subjects, and limited our search to articles published in English. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated various psychiatric interventions in trauma patients on the effects of psychiatric outcomes were included for analysis. The articles were independently reviewed for eligibility by two different reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed on nine studies with similar interventions, outcomes measured, and patient populations. RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty-four articles were identified [830 articles identified through database search, and 107 through article references]. Sixty-nine full-text articles were reviewed for eligibility. Of these, 33 were included for qualitative analysis. Thirteen studies evaluating the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based interventions on the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression symptoms underwent meta-analysis. While CBT-treated patients experienced clinically significant decreases in symptom severity, there were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups at follow-up for PTSD, anxiety, and depression. CONCLUSION: Compared with usual care, CBT-based interventions may not be effective in decreasing or preventing PTSD, anxiety, or depression symptoms in trauma survivors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review, level III.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ta.0000000000002371

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pham, C. H., Fang, M., Nager, J., Matsushima, K., Inaba, K., & Kuza, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Published
2019-05-30
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
463-482
ISSN
  • 2163-0755 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-0763
OpenAlex
W2947905405
Cited by
18
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
psychological intervention, trauma survivors, post-traumatic stress disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety, depression, psychiatric sequelae, mental health outcomes, trauma rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Wounds and Injuries, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review