Cited by 145Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Treatment of Acute Stress Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bryant, Richard A., Mastrodomenico, Julie, Felmingham, Kim L., Hopwood, Sally, Kenny, Lucy, Kandris, Eva, Cahill, Catherine, Creamer, Mark·2008·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: Recent trauma survivors with acute stress disorder (ASD) are likely to subsequently develop chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cognitive behavioral therapy for ASD may prevent PTSD, but trauma survivors may not tolerate exposure-based therapy in the acute phase. There is a need to compare nonexposure therapy techniques with prolonged exposure for ASD. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of exposure therapy or trauma-focused cognitive restructuring in preventing chronic PTSD relative to a wait-list control group. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized controlled trial of civilians who experienced trauma and who met the diagnostic criteria for ASD (N = 90) seen at an outpatient clinic between March 1, 2002, and June 30, 2006. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5 weekly 90-minute sessions of either imaginal and in vivo exposure (n = 30) or cognitive restructuring (n = 30), or assessment at baseline and after 6 weeks (wait-list group; n = 30). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of PTSD at the 6-month follow-up visit by clinical interview and self-report assessments of PTSD, depression, anxiety, and trauma-related cognition. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses indicated that at posttreatment, fewer patients in the exposure group had PTSD than those in the cognitive restructuring or wait-list groups (33% vs 63% vs 77%; P = .002). At follow-up, patients who underwent exposure therapy were more likely to not meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD than those who underwent cognitive restructuring (37% vs 63%; odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.94; P = .05) and to achieve full remission (47% vs 13%; odds ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-6.83; P = .005). On assessments of PTSD, depression, and anxiety, exposure resulted in markedly larger effect sizes at posttreatment and follow-up than cognitive restructuring. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure-based therapy leads to greater reduction in subsequent PTSD symptoms in patients with ASD when compared with cognitive restructuring. Exposure should be used in early intervention for people who are at high risk for developing PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.65.6.659

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most prior interventions targeting psychological outcomes were not informed by psychological insights and proven psychotherapeutic approaches delivered by trained mental health professionals.

    “This may be because most prior interventions, while targeting psychological outcomes, were not informed by psychological insights and proven psychotherapeutic approaches to promote adjustment to stress, grief, and trauma (21-24) delivered by trained mental health professionals.”
  • Surrogates who are anxious and/or emotionally dependent on the patient are at heightened risk of PTSD, Prolonged Grief Disorder, and other adverse longer-term psychological outcomes.

    “it targets surrogates who are anxious and/or emotionally dependent on the patient, thus placing them at heightened risk of PTSD, Prolonged Grief Disorder, and other adverse longer-term psychological outcomes (21, 22, 48, 61)”
  • Abridged versions of TF-CBT (usually 5-6 sessions) for early intervention in people at high risk for PTSD were typically more efficacious than control conditions.

    “These programs evaluated abridged versions of TF-CBT (usually 5-6 sessions), and typically found that they were more efficacious than control conditions 128-132 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryant, R. A., Mastrodomenico, J., Felmingham, K. L., Hopwood, S., Kenny, L., Kandris, E., Cahill, C., & Creamer, M.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2008-06-02
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
659
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064468202
Cited by
145
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (300304)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
acute stress disorder, prolonged exposure therapy, imaginal exposure, in vivo exposure, trauma survivors, early intervention, depression, anxiety
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Chronic Disease, Desensitization, Psychologic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Violence, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review