Cited by 12Biomedical Ethics and RegulationHealthcare RegulationTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Legal and Regulatory Challenges for Emerging Regenerative Medicine Solutions for Diabetes

Open access
Thom, Rebecca L., Cronin, Antonia J., the VANGUARD Consortium·2024·Transplantation

Abstract

Regenerative medicine solutions for type 1 diabetes are a rapidly developing field of medical technology. To date, these solutions have been principally cell-based treatments and at present, in Europe, these therapies are regulated under European Union regulations for advanced therapy medicinal products. But now, new emerging technology combining cellular therapy with medical devices is under development. The potential of this novel hybrid model to create a bioartificial pancreas to treat type 1 diabetes is tantalizing. However, incorporating medical devices creates a further layer of regulatory complexity. This article seeks to expose the complexity of this legal and regulatory landscape and demonstrate how evolving technology could challenge the entire existing legal paradigm. We start by summarizing the status of the only established cell-based therapy—transplantation. We set out the regulation of cellular therapies, their classification, and the role of statutory bodies. We examine the bottleneck of therapies moving from bench to bedside, and we consider the additional challenges of products, which use a combination of cells and medical devices. Finally, we argue that for the potential of this rapidly growing area of technology to be realized a seismic shift in how we regulate frontier cellular therapies will be required.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/tp.0000000000004797

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-genetically modified cell therapies and their derived extracellular vesicles are particularly promising because of lower regulatory complexity and potential for earlier clinical adoption.

    “Among these, non-genetically modified cell therapies and their derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are particularly promising because of their lower regulatory complexity and potential for earlier clinical adoption (Wang et al., 2021; Bahmani and Ullah, 2022; Thom and Cronin, 2024).”

    From Isolator-based point-of-care manufacturing: a practical solution for GMP-compliant cell and extracellular vesicles therapy production (2025) · cites this paper as Thom and Cronin, 2024

    In “Regulating Novel Cellular Therapies” (page unavailable), the paper says genetically modified cells face additional directives, supporting a narrower point about regulatory burden. “The ATMP Bottleneck” discusses barriers to bringing cell therapies to market, but the paper does not establish that non-genetically modified therapies will be adopted earlier or address their derived extracellular vesicles. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Pathak, 2019, Therapies for type 1 diabetes: current scenario and future perspectives., Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes, 12, 117955141984452, 10.1177/1179551419844521 · DOI
  2. McCrimmon, 2018, SGLT inhibitor adjunct therapy in type 1 diabetes., Diabetologia, 61, 2126, 10.1007/s00125-018-4671-6 · DOI
  3. Gruessner, 2022, International pancreas transplant registry report—a review., Transplant Proc, 2022, 1918, 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.03.059 · DOI
  4. Berney, 2022, International islet transplant centers: a worldwide survey of activities and practices in clinical islet of langerhans transplantation., Transpl Int, 35, 10507, 10.3389/ti.2022.10507 · DOI
  5. Wojtusciszyn, 2019, Indications for islet or pancreatic transplantation: statement of the TREPID working group on behalf of the Société francophone du diabète (SFD), Société francaise d’endocrinologie (SFE), Société francophone de transplantation (SFT) and Société française de néphrologie—dialyse—transplantation (SFNDT)., Diabetes Metab, 45, 224, 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.07.006 · DOI
  6. Dholakia, 2017, The rise and potential fall of pancreas transplantation., Br Med Bull, 124, 171
  7. Gruessner, 2016, Pancreas transplantation of US and non-US cases from 2005 to 2014 as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR)., Rev Diabet Stud, 13, 35, 10.1900/RDS.2016.13.35 · DOI
  8. Cimen, 2019, Challenges of pancreas transplantation in developing countries, exploring the Turkey example., World J Transplant, 9, 158, 10.5500/wjt.v9.i8.158 · DOI
  9. Manrique, 2009, Relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: causes and outcomes., Transplant Proc, 41, 2472, 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.165 · DOI
  10. Caiazzo, 2015, Impact of procedure-related complications on long-term islet transplantation outcome., Transplantation, 99, 979, 10.1097/TP.0000000000000458 · DOI
  11. Berney, 2022, From islet of langerhans transplantation to the bioartificial pancreas., Presse Med, 51, 104139, 10.1016/j.lpm.2022.104139 · DOI
  12. Bellin, 2020, Transplant strategies for type 1 diabetes: whole pancreas, islet and porcine beta cell therapies., Diabetologia, 63, 2049, 10.1007/s00125-020-05184-7 · DOI
  13. Cornwall, 2021, Advanced therapies: innovation, regulation and patentability in the UK., Biosci Law Rev, 18, 11
  14. Green, 2021, Type 1 diabetes in 2017: global estimates of incident and prevalent cases in children and adults., Diabetologia, 64, 2741, 10.1007/s00125-021-05571-8 · DOI
  15. Photiadis, 2021, The current status of bioartificial pancreas devices., ASAIO, 67, 370, 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001252 · DOI
  16. Wassmer, 2022, Bio-engineering of pre-vascularized islet organoids for the treatment of type 1 diabetes., Transpl Int, 35, 10214, 10.3389/ti.2021.10214 · DOI
  17. Hanna, 2022, Advances and challenges of endocrine pancreas bioengineering., Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res, 23, 100320, 10.1016/j.coemr.2022.100320 · DOI
  18. Wassmer, 2020, Generation of insulin-secreting organoids: a step toward engineering and transplanting the bioartificial pancreas., Transpl Int, 33, 1577, 10.1111/tri.13721 · DOI
  19. Iglesias-Lopez, 2021, Current landscape of clinical development and approval of advanced therapies., Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev, 23, 606, 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.11.003 · DOI
  20. Ronco, 2021, Price and reimbursement of advanced therapeutic medicinal products in Europe: are assessment and appraisal diverging from expert recommendations?, J Pharm Policy Pract, 14, 30, 10.1186/s40545-021-00311-0 · DOI
  21. Ten Ham, 2018, Challenges in advanced therapy medicinal product development: a survey among companies in Europe., Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev, 11, 121, 10.1016/j.omtm.2018.10.003 · DOI
  22. Jarman, 2021, Neither protective nor harmonized: the crossborder regulation of medical devices in the EU., Health Econ Policy Law, 16, 51, 10.1017/S1744133120000158 · DOI
  23. Groth, 1994, Transplantation of porcine fetal pancreas to diabetic patients., Lancet, 345, 735, 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90910-9 · DOI
  24. Porrett, 2022, First clinical-grade porcine kidney xenotransplant using a human decedent model., Am J Transplant, 22, 1037, 10.1111/ajt.16930 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Reardon, 2022, First pig-to-human heart transplant: what can scientists learn?, Nature, 601, 305, 10.1038/d41586-022-00111-9 · DOI
  26. Witkowski, 2021, The demise of islet allotransplantation in the United States: a call for an urgent regulatory update., Am J Transplant, 21, 1365, 10.1111/ajt.16397 · DOI
  27. Piemonti, 2021, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) panel endorses islet cell treatment for type 1 diabetes: a pyrrhic victory?, Transpl Int, 34, 1182, 10.1111/tri.13930 · DOI
  28. Auzanneau, 2021, Heterogeneity of access to diabetes technology depending on area deprivation and demographics between 2016 and 2019 in Germany., J Diabetes Sci Technol, 15, 1059, 10.1177/19322968211028608 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thom, R. L., Cronin, A. J., & the VANGUARD Consortium
Affiliations
Guy's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Thom, Rebecca L.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
2023-09-26
Volume
108
Issue
5
Pages
1072-1079
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387034089
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transplantation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (HORIZON2020, 874700)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, regenerative medicine, cell therapy, advanced therapy medicinal products, bioartificial pancreas, clinical translation, European Union regulation
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, European Union, Humans, Government Regulation, Regenerative Medicine, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review