The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Psychometric Properties and Practicability of Self-Report Instruments to Identify Medication Nonadherence in Adult Transplant Patients: A Systematic Review
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy is recognized as a key prognostic indicator for poor posttransplantation long-term outcomes. Several methods aiming to measure medication nonadherence have been suggested in the literature. Although combining measurement methods is regarded as the gold standard for measuring nonadherence, self-report is generally considered a central component of adherence assessment. However, no systematic review currently exists to determine which instrument(s) are most appropriate for use in transplant populations. METHODOLOGY: The transplant360 Task Force first performed a survey of the self-report adherence instruments currently used in European centers. Next, a systematic literature review of self-report instruments assessing medication adherence in chronically ill patients was conducted. Self-report instruments were evaluated to assess those which were: (a) short and easy to score; (b) assessed both the taking and timing of medication intake; and (c) had established reliability and validity. RESULTS: Fourteen instruments were identified from our survey of European centers, of which the Basel Assessment of Adherence Scale for Immunosuppressives met the aforementioned criteria. The systematic review found 20 self-report instruments, of which only two qualified for use in transplantation, that is, the Brief Antiretroviral Adherence Index and the Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory. DISCUSSION: The three selected self-report scales may assist transplant professionals in detecting nonadherence. However, these scales were only validated in patients with HIV. Although HIV shares similar characteristics with transplantation, including the importance of taking and timing of medication, further validation in transplant populations is required.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adherence can further be assessed by patients’ self-reports, e.g. the validated questionnaire BAASIS©[26].”
From Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Retracted: Predictive Validity of a Medication Adherence Measure in an Outpatient Setting
Morisky, D. E., Ang, A., Krousel‐Wood, M., & Ward, H. J. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x · Cited by 2,877
RetractedOsterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra050100 · Cited by 7,974
Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-reported Measure of Medication Adherence
Morisky, D. E., Green, L. W., & Levine, D. M. (1986) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007 · Cited by 5,399
Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research
Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp070364 · Cited by 1,805
Chesney, M. A., Ickovics, J. R., Chambers, D. B., Gifford, A. L., Neidig, J., Zwickl, B., Wu, A. W., & PATIENT CARE COMMITTEE & ADHERENCE (2000) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540120050042891 · Cited by 1,428
Reliability and validity of a new Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) for the psychoses
Thompson, K. N., Kulkarni, J., & Sergejew, A. A. (2000) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00130-9 · Cited by 1,055
Vrijens, B., Vincze, G., Kristanto, P., Urquhart, J., & Burnier, M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39553.670231.25 · Cited by 865
The brief medication questionnaire: A tool for screening patient adherence and barriers to adherence
Svarstad, B. L., Chewning, B. A., Sleath, B. L., & Claesson, C. B. (1999) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00107-4 · Cited by 660
Dew, M. A., DiMartini, A. F., Dabbs, A. D. V., Myaskovsky, L., Steel, J. L., Unruh, M. L., Switzer, G. E., Zomak, R. A., Kormos, R. L., & Greenhouse, J. B. (2007) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/01.tp.0000258599.65257.a6 · Cited by 571
Development and Testing of the Hill‐Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy Scale
Kim, M. T., Hill, M. N., Bone, L. R., & Levine, D. M. (2000) · Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7117.2000.tb00211.x · Cited by 514
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use
Stirratt, M. J., Dunbar-Jacob, J., Crane, H. M., Simoni, J. M., Czajkowski, S., Hilliard, M. E., Aikens, J. E., Hunter, C. M., Velligan, D. I., Huntley, K., et al. (2015) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-015-0315-2 · Cited by 824
Velleca, A., Shullo, M. A., Dhital, K. K., Azeka, E., Colvin, M. M., DePasquale, E. C., Farrero, M., García-Guereta, L., Jamero, G., Khush, K. K., et al. (2022) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.015 · Cited by 713
Self-citationWhat are validated self-report adherence scales really measuring?: a systematic review
Nguyen, T., Caze, A. L., & Cottrell, N. (2013) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.12194 · Cited by 431
Neuberger, J., Bechstein, W. O., Kuypers, D. R. J., Burra, P., Citterio, F., Geest, S. D., Duvoux, C., Jardine, A. G., Kamar, N., Krämer, B. K., et al. (2017) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000001651 · Cited by 327
Assessing medication adherence: options to consider
Lehmann, A., Aslani, P., Ahmed, R. A., Dotta-Celio, J., Gauchet, A., Bedouch, P., Bugnon, O., Allenet, B., & Schneider, M. P. (2013) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-013-9865-x · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobbels, F., Berben, L., De Geest, S., Drent, G., Lennerling, A., Whittaker, C., & Kugler, C.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- University of Basel (CH)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Royal London Hospital (GB)
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Dobbels, Fabienne
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 2010-07-27
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-219
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116897123
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transplantation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Keywords
- medication non-adherence, transplant recipients, immunosuppressive therapy, psychometric properties, adherence measurement, instrument validation
- MeSH terms
- Assessment of Medication Adherence, Adult, Humans, Immunosuppression Therapy, Prognosis, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Transplantation, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Drug Monitoring, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
