Cited by 126Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Affective and motivational control of vision

Open access
Vuilleumier, Patrik·2015·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

Purpose of review It is increasingly recognized that affective values associated with visual stimuli can influence visual perception, attention, and eye movements. Recent research has begun to uncover the brain mechanisms mediating these phenomena. The present review summarizes the main paradigms and findings demonstrating emotional and motivational influences on visual processing. Recent findings Several pathways have been identified for enhancing neural responses of cortical visual areas to stimuli with intrinsic emotional value (e.g., facial expressions, social scenes, and others), including projections from the amygdala and ascending modulatory neurotransmitter systems from the brainstem. These pathways can guide attention and gaze to emotionally salient information with either negative (threatening) or positive (rewarding) associations. In addition, abundant research in recent years suggests that probabilistic reward learning can lead to powerful biases in visual attention and saccade control through subcortical pathways connecting visual areas with basal ganglia and superior colliculus. Time-resolved neuroimaging using electroencephalography or magnetoencephalography has begun to tackle the time course of these effects, and can now be complemented by neuroimaging and neurophysiology recordings in monkey. Summary These findings have implications for understanding and assessing affective biases in perception and attention in patients with psychiatric disorders, such as ph…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0000000000000159

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 76 · Cited by 126

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Friston, 2012, Prediction, perception and agency., Int J Psychophysiol, 83, 248, 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Pourtois, 2013, Brain mechanisms for emotional influences on perception and attention: what is magic and what is not., Biol Psychol, 92, 492, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Lundqvist, 2014, Finding an emotional face in a crowd: Emotional and perceptual stimulus factors influence visual search efficiency., Cogn Emot, 16, 1
  4. Todd, 2012, Psychophysical and neural evidence for emotion-enhanced perceptual vividness., J Neurosci, 32, 11201, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0155-12.2012 · DOI
  5. Niu, 2012, Affective salience can reverse the effects of stimulus-driven salience on eye movements in complex scenes., Front Psychol, 3, 336
  6. Humphrey, 2012, Salience of the lambs: a test of the saliency map hypothesis with pictures of emotive objects., J Vis, 12, 12, 10.1167/12.1.22 · DOI
  7. Ruff, 2013, Sensory processing: whos in (top-down) control Ann NY Acad S, ci, 1296, 88
  8. Steinberg, 2013, Rapid and highly resolving associative affective learning: convergent electro- and magnetoencephalographic evidence from vision and audition., Biol Psychol, 92, 526, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.009 · DOI
  9. Schonwald, 2014, Slow biasing of processing resources in early visual cortex is preceded by emotional cue extraction in emotion-attention competition., Hum Brain Map, 35, 1477, 10.1002/hbm.22267 · DOI
  10. Wieser, 2014, Fearful faces heighten the cortical representation of contextual threat., NeuroImage, 86, 317, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.008 · DOI
  11. Uusberg, 2013, Unintentionality of affective attention across visual processing stages., Front Psychol, 4, 969, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00969 · DOI
  12. Ikeda, 2013, Fearful faces grab attention in the absence of late affective cortical responses., Psychophysiology, 50, 60, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01478.x · DOI
  13. Moors, 2006, Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis., Psychol Bull, 132, 297, 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297 · DOI
  14. Markovic, 2014, Tuning to the significant: neural and genetic processes underlying affective enhancement of visual perception and memory., Behav Brain Res, 259, 229, 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.018 · DOI
  15. Rotshtein, 2010, Amygdala damage affects event-related potentials for fearful faces at specific time windows., Hum Brain Map, 31, 1089, 10.1002/hbm.20921 · DOI
  16. Tsuchiya, 2009, Intact rapid detection of fearful faces in the absence of the amygdala., Nat Neurosci, 12, 1224, 10.1038/nn.2380 · DOI
  17. Piech, 2011, Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is preserved in patients with amygdala lesions., Neuropsychologia, 49, 3314, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.004 · DOI
  18. Edmiston, 2013, Enhanced visual cortical activation for emotional stimuli is preserved in patients with unilateral amygdala resection., J Neurosci, 33, 11023, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0401-13.2013 · DOI
  19. Hadj-Bouziane, 2012, Amygdala lesions disrupt modulation of functional MRI activity evoked by facial expression in the monkey inferior temporal cortex., Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 109, E3640, 10.1073/pnas.1218406109 · DOI
  20. Gattass, 2014, Subcortical connections of area V4 in the macaque., J Comp Neurol, 522, 1941, 10.1002/cne.23513 · DOI
  21. Gomez, 2011, Emotion modulates the effects of endogenous attention on retinotopic visual processing., NeuroImage, 57, 1542, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.072 · DOI
  22. Ferneyhough, 2013, Anxiety modulates the effects of emotion and attention on early vision., Cogn Emot, 27, 166, 10.1080/02699931.2012.689953 · DOI
  23. Todd, 2013, Genes for emotion-enhanced remembering are linked to enhanced perceiving., Psychol Sci, 24, 2244, 10.1177/0956797613492423 · DOI
  24. Peck, 2014, The amygdala and basal forebrain as a pathway for motivationally guided attention., J Neurosci, 34, 13757, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2106-14.2014 · DOI
  25. Bentley, 2003, Cholinergic enhancement modulates neural correlates of selective attention and emotional processing., NeuroImage, 20, 58, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00302-1 · DOI
  26. Sterpenich, 2014, Sleep sharpens sensory stimulus coding in human visual cortex after fear conditioning., NeuroImage, 100, 608, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.003 · DOI
  27. Gdalyahu, 2012, Associative fear learning enhances sparse network coding in primary sensory cortex., Neuron, 75, 121, 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.035 · DOI
  28. Anderson, 2013, Reward predictions bias attentional selection., Front Hum Neurosci, 7, 262, 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00262 · DOI
  29. Della Libera, 2006, Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards., Psychol Sci, 17, 222, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01689.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kiss, 2009, Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection., Psychol Sci, 20, 245, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02281.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hickey, 2013, Reward-associated stimuli capture the eyes in spite of strategic attentional set., Vis Res, 92, 67, 10.1016/j.visres.2013.09.008 · DOI
  32. Anderson, 2013, Persistence of value-driven attentional capture., J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Performance, 39, 6, 10.1037/a0030860 · DOI
  33. Lee, 2014, Reward-based transfer from bottom-up to top-down search tasks., Psychol Sci, 25, 466, 10.1177/0956797613509284 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Sali, 2014, The role of reward prediction in the control of attention., J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Performance, 40, 1654, 10.1037/a0037267 · DOI
  35. Pool, 2014, Where is the chocolate Rapid spatial orienting toward stimuli associated with primary rewards., Cognition, 130, 348, 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.002 · DOI
  36. Chelazzi, 2014, Altering spatial priority maps via reward-based learning., J Neurosci, 34, 8594, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0277-14.2014 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hickey, 2014, Reward-priming of location in visual search., PloS One, 9, e103372, 10.1371/journal.pone.0103372 · DOI
  38. Stankevich, 2014, Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection., Attent Percep Psychophys, 76, 2315, 10.3758/s13414-014-0720-5 · DOI
  39. Towal, 2013, Simultaneous modeling of visual saliency and value computation improves predictions of economic choice., Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 110, E3858, 10.1073/pnas.1304429110 · DOI
  40. Failing, 2014, Exogenous visual orienting by reward., J Vis, 14, 6, 10.1167/14.5.6 · DOI
  41. Shomstein, 2013, Shaping attention with reward: effects of reward on space- and object-based selection., Psychol Sci, 24, 2369, 10.1177/0956797613490743 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Theeuwes, 2012, Reward grabs the eye: oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli., Vis Res, 74, 80, 10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.024 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Hickey, 2012, Reward creates oculomotor salience., Curr Biol, 22, R219, 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.007 · DOI
  44. Camara, 2013, Past rewards capture spatial attention and action choices., Exp Brain Res, 230, 291, 10.1007/s00221-013-3654-6 · DOI
  45. Serences, 2008, Value-based modulations in human visual cortex., Neuron, 60, 1169, 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.051 · DOI
  46. Arsenault, 2013, Dopaminergic reward signals selectively decrease fMRI activity in primate visual cortex., Neuron, 77, 1174, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.008 · DOI
  47. Peck, 2009, Reward modulates attention independently of action value in posterior parietal cortex., J Neurosci, 29, 11182, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1929-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Tosoni, 2013, Distinct representations for shifts of spatial attention and changes of reward contingencies in the human brain., Cortex, 49, 1733, 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.03.022 · DOI
  49. Buschschulte, 2014, Reward- and attention-related biasing of sensory selection in visual cortex., J Cogn Neurosci, 26, 1049, 10.1162/jocn_a_00539 · DOI
  50. Doallo, 2013, Reward associations magnify memory-based biases on perception., J Cogn Neurosci, 25, 245, 10.1162/jocn_a_00314 · DOI
  51. Qi, 2013, Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search., Brain Res, 1532, 32, 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.044 · DOI
  52. Kim, 2013, Distinct basal ganglia circuits controlling behaviors guided by flexible and stable values., Neuron, 79, 1001, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.044 · DOI
  53. Yamamoto, 2013, Reward value-contingent changes of visual responses in the primate caudate tail associated with a visuomotor skill., J Neurosci, 33, 11227, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0318-13.2013 · DOI
  54. Hikosaka, 2014, Basal ganglia circuits for reward value-guided behavior., Annu Rev Neurosci, 37, 289, 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013924 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Weldon, 2008, Single unit activity in the rat superior colliculus during reward magnitude task performance., Behav Neurosci, 122, 183, 10.1037/0735-7044.122.1.183 · DOI
  56. Ikeda, 2007, Positive and negative modulation of motor response in primate superior colliculus by reward expectation., J Neurophysiol, 98, 3163, 10.1152/jn.00975.2007 · DOI
  57. Clarke, 2013, Assessing the role of spatial engagement and disengagement of attention in anxiety-linked attentional bias: a critique of current paradigms and suggestions for future research directions., Anxiety Stress Coping, 26, 1, 10.1080/10615806.2011.638054 · DOI
  58. Shechner, 2012, Attention biases, anxiety, and development: toward or away from threats or rewards Depression A, nxiety, 29, 282
  59. Weymar, 2013, Specific fear modulates attentional selectivity during visual search: electrophysiological insights from the N2pc., Psychophysiology, 50, 139, 10.1111/psyp.12008 · DOI
  60. Weymar, 2014, Timing the fearful brain: unspecific hypervigilance and spatial attention in early visual perception., Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 9, 723, 10.1093/scan/nst044 · DOI
  61. Rossi, 2014, Electrical neuroimaging reveals content-specific effects of threat in primary visual cortex and fronto-parietal attentional networks., NeuroImage, 98, 11, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.064 · DOI
  62. Hickey, 2010, Reward guides vision when its your thing: trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated visual priming., PloS One, 5, e14087, 10.1371/journal.pone.0014087 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Vanlessen, 2013, Positive emotion broadens attention focus through decreased position-specific spatial encoding in early visual cortex: evidence from ERPs., Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 13, 60, 10.3758/s13415-012-0130-x · DOI
  64. Vanlessen, 2014, Feeling happy enhances early spatial encoding of peripheral information automatically: electrophysiological time-course and neural sources., Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 14, 951, 10.3758/s13415-014-0262-2 · DOI
  65. Vuilleumier, 2013, Mapping the functional neuroanatomy of spatial neglect and human parietal lobe functions: progress and challenges., Ann NY Acad Sci, 1296, 50, 10.1111/nyas.12161 · DOI
  66. Dominguez-Borras, 2013, Partial recovery of visual extinction by pavlovian conditioning in a patient with hemispatial neglect., Cortex, 49, 891, 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.005 · DOI
  67. Lucas, 2013, Gambling against neglect: unconscious spatial biases induced by reward reinforcement in healthy people and brain-damaged patients., Cortex, 49, 2616, 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.004 · DOI
  68. Vuilleumier, 2009, Interactions of emotion and attention., Cogn Neurosci IV, 4, 925

Metadata

Authors
Vuilleumier, P.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Vuilleumier, Patrik
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2015-02
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
29-35
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004805863
Cited by
126
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
visual attention, saccade control, eye movements, amygdala, probabilistic reward learning, basal ganglia, superior colliculus, emotional salience, facial expressions, social scenes, time course of attention, mental illness
MeSH terms
Affect, Attention, Humans, Motivation, Reward, Visual Perception, Vision, Binocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review