Cited by 359Embodied and Extended CognitionFree Will and AgencyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Prediction, perception and agency.

Open access
Friston, Karl·2012·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

The articles in this special issue provide a rich and thoughtful perspective on the brain as an inference machine. They illuminate key aspects of the internal or generative models the brain might use for perception. Furthermore, they explore the implications for a sense of agency and the nature of false inference in neuropsychiatric syndromes. In this review, I try to gather together some of the themes that emerge in this special issue and use them to illustrate how far one can take the notion of predictive coding in understanding behaviour and agency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.014

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A motive itself can be conceived of as being set to expect a particular input, along the lines proposed in predictive coding theory.

    “A motive itself can be conceived of as being set to expect a particular input, along the lines proposed in predictive coding theory (Von Holst and Mittelstaedt, 1950; Friston, 2012; Clark, 2013).”

    From Impulsive action: emotional impulses and their control (2014) · cites this paper as Friston, 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friston, K.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Friston, Karl
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
248-252
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025575849
Cited by
359
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (088130)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
predictive coding, generative models, perception, sense of agency, neuropsychiatric syndromes, prediction
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Learning, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Perception, Sensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review