Cited by 76Schizophrenia research and treatmentSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health and Psychiatry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Causes of premature mortality in schizophrenia: a review of literature published in 2018

Laursen, Thomas M.·2019·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review examines the recent literature on the causes of premature mortality in schizophrenia. RECENT FINDINGS: People with schizophrenia have higher premature mortality rates compared with the general population. Suicides and accidents account for a nontrivial part of the excess mortality, but the largest part is attributable to natural causes of death. Five major causes have been identified: first, adverse effects of medication; second, suboptimal lifestyle; third, somatic comorbidity; fourth, suboptimal treatment of somatic disorders; and fifth, accelerated ageing/genetic explanations. The positive aspect is that people with schizophrenia have increasing life expectancy, at least in high-income countries, and this development seems to largely follow the increase in the general population. Especially mortality rates from unnatural causes appear to have a positive impact. Nevertheless, despite more than 100 years of research and progress, the excess mortality in persons with schizophrenia remains unacceptably high, with no prospects of reaching the level in the general population. SUMMARY: The excess mortality in schizophrenia has received much focus. Future studies should explore the reasons for the high rates of natural causes of death, while aiming to disentangle the complex interplay between medication, lifestyle, comorbidity, treatment of somatic disorders, and genetic effects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000530

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Laursen, T. M.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Laursen, Thomas M.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2019-09
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
388-393
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946763672
Cited by
76
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Lundbeckfonden (R248‐2017‐2003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, premature mortality, excess mortality, suicide, accidents, natural death, adverse drug reactions, lifestyle, somatic comorbidity, accelerated aging, genetic factors, life expectancy
MeSH terms
Humans, Life Expectancy, Life Style, Schizophrenia, Suicide, Antipsychotic Agents, Comorbidity, Mortality, Premature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review