Cited by 70Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital technology for management of severe mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries

Open access

Abstract

Purpose of review: Increasingly, digital technologies, especially mobile telecommunications and smartphone apps, are seen as a novel tool for managing severe mental disorders (SMDs) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is a need to identify best practices in the use of digital technologies to effectively reach, support, and manage care for patients living with SMDs. In this review, we summarize recent studies using digital technology to manage symptoms and support clinical care for this patient population and discuss new opportunities to advance digital psychiatry research and practice in LMICs. Recent findings: Studies evaluating digital interventions for clinical populations living with SMDs in LMICs are limited. Yet, across recent articles surveyed, digital technology appears to yield diverse benefits for this at-risk patient population. These benefits include improved medication adherence, appointment adherence, reduced instances of relapse, and fewer re-hospitalizations. Summary: Continued rigorous research evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of digital technologies in reaching, treating, and managing symptoms and supporting clinical care for patients with SMDs in LMICs is vital. The urgency for remote approaches for delivering specialized psychiatric care is particularly pronounced because of the immediate and long-term impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on access to in-person services. Future research should emphasize participatory approaches rooted in a process of codesign with target users, in order to achieve clinically effective remotely delivered digital mental health interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000626

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fang, 2011, Effects of daily short message reminder for preventing schizophrenia recrudescence, Nurs J Chin PLA, 7, 74

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
Merchant, R., Torous, J., Rodriguez-Villa, E., & Naslund, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Naslund, John A.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2020-06-09
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
501-507
ISSN
  • 0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6578
OpenAlex
W3033971361
Cited by
70
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (215843/Z/19/Z, WT215843/Z/19/Z)
  • National Institutes of Health (5u19mh113211-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U19 MH-113211, K23MH116130)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
severe mental illness, digital mental health interventions, mobile health, mobile application, low- and middle-income countries, medication adherence, relapse prevention, hospital readmission, remote psychiatric care, COVID-19 pandemic, participatory design, co-design, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Internet-Based Intervention, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Mental Disorders, Developing Countries, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Socioeconomic Factors, Telemedicine, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review