Cited by 9Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Risk factors of relapse after successful electroconvulsive therapy for Taiwanese patients with major depression

Yang, Wei-Cheng, Lin, Ching-Hua, Chen, Cheng-Chung·2020·The Journal of ECT

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Major depressive disorder is a recurrent illness. Treatment strategies are generally focused on achieving remission and preventing relapse/recurrence. The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors associated with relapse for remitted patients during the 12-week follow-up. METHODS: This was an open-label trial for major depressive disorder patients receiving acute treatments with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and continuation medication in the 12-week follow-up. Symptom severity and psychosocial functioning were assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale at each visit. Remission was defined as a HAMD-17 of 7 or less after acute treatment. Relapse was defined as a HAMD-17 of 14 or greater. Subjects achieving remission after acute treatments were included for analysis. Survival analysis was used to investigate the factors associated with relapse. RESULTS: Sixty patients receiving ECT for acute treatment were enrolled for 12-week follow-up. Using Cox regression analysis, a greater number of previous major depressive episodes and greater baseline Work and Social Adjustment Scale scores were significantly associated with shorter time to relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The goal of acute treatment should focus on functional remission to prevent relapse. Further studies related to more effective treatments to prevent relapse after acute ECT are required in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yct.0000000000000619

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 20 articles define relapse with psychometric measures (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale, Clinical Global Impression).

    “20 do so with psychometric measures (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale, Clinical Global Impression) (4, 7, 9, 13–18, 33, 34, 42–49)”
  • 13 of the 20 studies using scales use the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, with varied score criteria: 8, 12, 14, 16, 18, and up to 20.

    “13 of the 20 use the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, although the score they establish as a criterion is very varied, with some considering a score of 8 points (4) as sufficient for a relapse, others of 12 (20), 14 (13, 14, 44), 16 (17, 18) 18 (47, 49) and up to 20 (9).”
  • The extracted medians showed substantial heterogeneity, ranging from very early relapse in severe or treatment-resistant samples with medians between 53 and 90 days to substantially longer intervals in maintenance-treated populations (218-294 days).

    “The extracted medians showed substantial heterogeneity, ranging from very early relapse in severe or treatment−resistant samples with medians between 53 and 90 days (14, 21, 23, 38) to substantially longer intervals in maintenance−treated populations (218–294 days) (33, 40, 45).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, W.-C., Lin, C.-H., & Chen, C.-C.
Affiliations
  • Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Wei-Cheng
  • Lin, Ching-Hua
  • Chen, Cheng-Chung
Venue
The Journal of ECT
Published
2019-07-24
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
106-110
ISSN
  • 1095-0680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4112
OpenAlex
W2966567739
Cited by
9
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, electroconvulsive therapy, relapse, risk factors, remission, recurrence prevention, work and social adjustment, psychosocial functioning, Taiwanese patients, number of depressive episodes
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Social Adjustment, Taiwan, Work, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review