Cited by 78Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Predicting relapse in major depressive disorder using patient-reported outcomes of depressive symptom severity, functioning, and quality of life in the individual burden of illness index for depression (IBI-D)

Open access
IsHak, Waguih William, Greenberg, Jared M., Cohen, Robert M.·2013·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) often experience unexpected relapses, despite achieving remission. This study examines the utility of a single multidimensional measure that captures variance in patient-reported Depressive Symptom Severity, Functioning, and Quality of Life (QOL), in predicting MDD relapse.Methods Complete data from remitted patients at the completion of 12 weeks of citalopram in the STAR*D study were used to calculate the Individual Burden of Illness index for Depression (IBI-D), and predict subsequent relapse at six (n=956), nine (n=778), and twelve months (n=479) using generalized linear models.Results Depressive Symptom Severity, Functioning, and QOL were all predictors of subsequent relapse. Using Akaike information criteria (AIC), the IBI-D provided a good model for relapse even when Depressive Symptom Severity, Functioning, and QOL were combined in a single model. Specifically, an increase of one in the IBI-D increased the odds ratio of relapse by 2.5 at 6 months (β=0.921 ± 0.194, z=4.76, p<2 × 10(-6)), by 2.84 at 9 months (β=1.045 ± 0.22, z=4.74, p<2.2 × 10(-6)), and by 4.1 at 12 months (β=1.41 ± 0.29, z=4.79, p<1.7 × 10(-6)).Limitations Self-report poses a risk to measurement precision. Using highly valid and reliable measures could mitigate this risk. The IBI-D requires time and effort for filling out the scales and index calculation. Technological solutions could help ease these burdens. The sample suffered from attrition. Separate analysis of dropouts would be helpful.Conclusions Incorporating patient-reported outcomes of Functioning and QOL in addition to Depressive Symptom Severity in the IBI-D is useful in assessing the full burden of illness and in adequately predicting relapse, in MDD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.048

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing TRD definitions fail to take into consideration the social, economic, anamnestic and interpersonal factors which, alone or in combinations, are known to moderate antidepressant response.

    “Further drawbacks of existing TRD defi­ nitions are that they fail to take into consid­ eration the social, economic, anamnestic (e.g., adverse childhood experiences) and interpersonal factors which, alone or in combinations, are known to moderate antidepressant response 1,44,47,71,75-­ 81 .”

    From Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies psychosocial stressors, family history, and illness history as factors associated with relapse after remission. It does not assess TRD definitions or establish that social, economic, childhood-experience, or interpersonal factors moderate antidepressant response. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with remitted major depressive disorder with functional impairment are at higher risk of relapse.

    “Functional impairment and residual symptoms such as emotional blunting are important as research has shown that patients with remitted MDD with functional impairment are at higher risk of relapse (IsHak et al., 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
IsHak, W. W., Greenberg, J. M., & Cohen, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
IsHak, Waguih William
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
151
Issue
1
Pages
59-65
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022886395
Cited by
78
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH
  • NIMH (N01MH90003)
  • the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (NCT00021528)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
major depressive disorder, recurrence prediction, patient-reported outcomes, depression severity, functioning, quality of life, remitted depression, STAR*D, citalopram, disease burden
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Risk Factors, Citalopram, Cost of Illness, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review