Cited by 28Child Abuse and TraumaNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The interactive effect of the MAOA-VNTR genotype and childhood abuse on aggressive behaviors in Chinese male adolescents

Zhang, Yun, Ming, Qingsen, Wang, Xiang, Yao, Shuqiao·2016·Psychiatric Genetics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gene-environment interactions that moderate aggressive behavior have been identified in association with the MAOA (monoamine oxidase A) gene. The present study examined the moderating effect of MAOA-VNTR (variable number of tandem repeats) on aggression behavior relating to child abuse among Chinese adolescents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 507 healthy Chinese male adolescents completed the Child Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF) and Youth Self-report of the Child Behavior Checklist. The participants' buccal cells were sampled and subjected to DNA analysis. The effects of childhood abuse (CTQ-SF scores), MAOA-VNTR [high-activity allele (H) versus low-activity allele (L)], and their interaction in aggressive behaviors were analyzed by linear regression. RESULTS: Child maltreatment was found to be a significant independent factor in the manifestation of aggressive behavior, whereas MAOA activity was not. There was a significant interaction between MAOA-VNTR and childhood maltreatment in the exhibition of aggressive behaviors. In the context of physical or emotional abuse, boys in the MAOA-L group showed a greater tendency toward aggression than those in the MAOA-H group. CONCLUSION: Aggressive behavior arising from childhood maltreatment is moderated by MAOA-VNTR, which may be differentially sensitive to the subtype of childhood maltreatment experienced, among Chinese adolescents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ypg.0000000000000125

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Li, 2005, The investigation of urban child abuse and influencing factors in Xinyu, Chin J Gen Pract, 4, 502

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Ming, Q., Wang, X., & Yao, S.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yao, Shuqiao
Venue
Psychiatric Genetics
Published
2016-06
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
117-123
ISSN
0955-8829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294535673
Cited by
28
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Key Technologies Research and Development Program
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
monoamine oxidase A, childhood abuse, child abuse, aggression, gene-environment interaction, moderating effect, physical abuse, emotional abuse, Chinese adolescents, adolescent boys
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Aggression, Child Abuse, China, Genotype, Humans, Male, Monoamine Oxidase, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Minisatellite Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review