Cited by 122Primate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentMemory Processes and Influences

Eurasian jays ( Garrulus glandarius ) overcome their current desires to anticipate two distinct future needs and plan for them appropriately

Open access
Cheke, Lucy G., Clayton, Nicola S.·2012·Biology Letters

Abstract

Western scrub-jays ( Aphelocoma californica ) have been shown to overcome present satiety to cache food they will desire in the future. Here, we show that another corvid, the Eurasian jay ( Garrulus glandarius ), can distinguish between two distinct future desires and plan for each appropriately, despite experiencing a conflicting current motivation. We argue that these data address the criticisms of previous work, and suggest a way in which associative learning processes and future-oriented cognition may combine to allow prospective behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0909

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both scrub-jays and Eurasian jays appear to plan for future needs that differ from their current motivational states.

    “both scrub-jays and Eurasian jays appear to plan for future needs that differ from their current motivational states [160,161]”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [160]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheke, L. G., & Clayton, N. S.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2011-11-02
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
171-175
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W2020633116
Cited by
122
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
Eurasian jay, Garrulus glandarius, satiety, food caching, future-oriented cognition, associative learning, corvid cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Appetite, Cognition, Cues, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Male, Motivation, Time Perception, Songbirds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review