Cited by 10Primate Behavior and EcologyMemory Processes and InfluencesChild and Animal Learning Development

Testing two competing hypotheses for Eurasian jays’ caching for the future

Open access
Amodio, Piero, Brea, Johanni, Farrar, Benjamin G., Ostojić, Ljerka, Clayton, Nicola S.·2021·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Previous research reported that corvids preferentially cache food in a location where no food will be available or cache more of a specific food in a location where this food will not be available. Here, we consider possible explanations for these prospective caching behaviours and directly compare two competing hypotheses. The Compensatory Caching Hypothesis suggests that birds learn to cache more of a particular food in places where that food was less frequently available in the past. In contrast, the Future Planning Hypothesis suggests that birds recall the ‘what–when–where’ features of specific past events to predict the future availability of food. We designed a protocol in which the two hypotheses predict different caching patterns across different caching locations such that the two explanations can be disambiguated. We formalised the hypotheses in a Bayesian model comparison and tested this protocol in two experiments with one of the previously tested species, namely Eurasian jays. Consistently across the two experiments, the observed caching pattern did not support either hypothesis; rather it was best explained by a uniform distribution of caches over the different caching locations. Future research is needed to gain more insight into the cognitive mechanism underpinning corvids’ caching for the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-80515-7

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the caching and previous future planning paradigms have been criticized for not showing evidence of true foresight as seen in humans, or have failed to replicate.

    “both this and the previous paradigm have been criticized for not showing evidence of true foresight as seen in humans [164,165], or have failed to replicate [166].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [166]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amodio, P., Brea, J., Farrar, B. G., Ostojić, L., & Clayton, N. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Rijeka (HR)
Corresponding author
Amodio, Piero
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-01-12
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
835-835
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119997424
Cited by
10
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 200020_165538 and 200020_184615)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M011194/1)
  • European Research Council (FP7/2007-2012, Grant Agreement 3399933)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
Eurasian jay, food caching, corvid cognition, spatial memory, Bayesian model selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review