Cited by 204Impact of Light on Environment and HealthCircadian rhythm and melatoninNight-time city culture

Light at night, clocks and health: from humans to wild organisms

Open access
Dominoni, Davide M., Borniger, Jeremy C., Nelson, Randy J.·2016·Biology Letters

Abstract

The increasing use of electric lights has modified the natural light environment dramatically, posing novel challenges to both humans and wildlife. Indeed, several biomedical studies have linked artificial light at night to the disruption of circadian rhythms, with important consequences for human health, such as the increasing occurrence of metabolic syndromes, cancer and reduced immunity. In wild animals, light pollution is associated with changes in circadian behaviour, reproduction and predator–prey interactions, but we know little about the underlying physiological mechanisms and whether wild species suffer the same health problems as humans. In order to fill this gap, we advocate the need for integrating ecological studies in the field, with chronobiological approaches to identify and characterize pathways that may link temporal disruption caused by light at night and potential health and fitness consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0015

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]5. Rich, C. and Longcore, T. (2006) Artificial Night Lighting, Island Press.
  2. [23]23. Spoelstra, K. et al. (2015) Experimental illumination of natural habitat -direct and indirect ecological consequences of artificial light of different spectral composition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 370, 20140129

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dominoni, D. M., Borniger, J. C., & Nelson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dominoni, Davide M.
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2016-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
20160015
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W2287542396
Cited by
204
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01 NS092388, R21 CA191846)
  • NSF (IOS-11-18792)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Impact of Light on Environment and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Night-time city culture
Keywords
artificial light at night, light pollution, circadian rhythm, circadian rhythm disruption, wildlife health, human health, metabolic syndrome, cancer, immunity, reproduction, predator-prey interactions, chronobiology
MeSH terms
Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Ecology, Health Status, Humans, Light, Chronobiology Discipline, Genetic Fitness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review