The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction
Abstract
The pattern of residue substitution in divergently evolving families of globular proteins is highly variable. At each position in a fold there are constraints on the identities of amino acids from both the three-dimensional structure and the function of the protein. To characterize and quantify the structural constraints, we have made a comparative analysis of families of homologous globular proteins. Residues are classified according to amino acid type, secondary structure, accessibility of the sidechain, and existence of hydrogen bonds from sidechain to other sidechains or peptide carbonyl or amide functions. There are distinct patterns of substitution especially where residues are both solvent inaccessible and hydrogen bonded through their sidechains. The patterns of residue substitution can be used to construct templates or to identify 'key' residues if one or more structures are known. Conversely, analysis of conversation and substitution across a large family of aligned sequences in terms of substitution profiles can allow prediction of tertiary environment or indicate a functional role. Similar analyses can be used to test the validity of putative structures if several homologous sequences are available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins.
Chothia, C., & Lesk, A. M. (1986) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04288.x · Cited by 2,458
Chou, P. Y., & Fasman, G. D. (1974) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00699a001 · Cited by 2,172
Cited by
A new approach to protein fold recognition
Jones, D. T., Taylort, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358086a0 · Cited by 1,221
Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by M ODELLER
Šali, A., Potterton, L., Yuan, F., van Vlijmen, H., & Karplus, M. (1995) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340230306 · Cited by 1,085
Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites
Echave, J., Spielman, S. J., & Wilke, C. O. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2015.18 · Cited by 328
Assessing the Impact of Secondary Structure and Solvent Accessibility on Protein Evolution
Goldman, N., Thorne, J. L., & Jones, D. T. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/149.1.445 · Cited by 281
A new criterion and method for amino acid classification
Kosiol, C., Goldman, N., & H. Buttimore, N. (2004) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.12.010 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1990-08-22
- Volume
- 241
- Issue
- 1301
- Pages
- 132-145
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2065385636
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1990.0077
- The paper
- Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction. (1990). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1990.0077
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.