The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Task–specific impairments and enhancements induced by magnetic stimulation of human visual area V5
Open accessAbstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to simulate the effects of highly circumscribed brain damage permanently present in some neuropsychological patients, by reversibly disrupting the normal functioning of the cortical area to which it is applied. By using TMS we attempted to recreate deficits similar to those reported in a motion-blind patient and to assess the specificity of deficits when TMS is applied over human area V5. We used six visual search tasks and showed that subjects were impaired in a motion but not a form 'pop-out' task when TMS was applied over V5. When motion was present, but irrelevant, or when attention to colour and form were required, TMS applied to V5 enhanced performance. When attention to motion was required in a motion-form conjunction search task, irrespective of whether the target was moving or stationary, TMS disrupted performance. These data suggest that attention to different visual attributes involves mutual inhibition between different extrastriate visual areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4023713 · Cited by 2,433
Newsome, W., & Pare, E. (1988) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-06-02201.1988 · Cited by 1,615
A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex
Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., & Desimone, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363345a0 · Cited by 1,114
Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST
Treue, S., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382539a0 · Cited by 1,025
Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action
Jueptner, M., Stephan, K. M., Frith, C. D., Brooks, D. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Passingham, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1313 · Cited by 624
Cited by
Rossini, P. M., Burke, D., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., Daskalakis, Z., Di Iorio, R., Di Lazzaro, V., Ferreri, F., Fitzgerald, P. B., George, M. S., et al. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 · Cited by 2,753
Self-citationTowards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework
Dehaene, S. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00123-2 · Cited by 2,498
Pascual-Leone, A. (2000) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00081-7 · Cited by 923
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience
Walsh, V., & Cowey, A. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35036239 · Cited by 814
Self-citationState-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition
Silvanto, J., Muggleton, N., & Walsh, V. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.004 · Cited by 572
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, V., Ellison, A., Battelli, L., & Cowey, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1998-03-22
- Volume
- 265
- Issue
- 1395
- Pages
- 537-543
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W1967279856
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Task–specific impairments and enhancements induced by magnetic stimulation of human visual area V5. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1998.0328
- The paper
- Walsh, V., Ellison, A., Battelli, L., & Cowey, A. (1998). Task–specific impairments and enhancements induced by magnetic stimulation of human visual area V5. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0328
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
