Cited by 301Primate Behavior and EcologyVisual perception and processing mechanismsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Visual specialization and brain evolution in primates

Open access
Barton, R. A.·1998·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Several theories have been proposed to explain the evolution of species differences in brain size, but no consensus has emerged. One unresolved question is whether brain size differences are a result of neural specializations or of biological constraints affecting the whole brain. Here I show that, among primates, brain size variation is associated with visual specialization. Primates with large brains for their body size have relatively expanded visual brain areas, including the primary visual cortex and lateral geniculate nucleus. Within the visual system, it is, in particular, one functionally specialized pathway upon which selection has acted: evolutionary changes in the number of neurons in parvocellular, but not magnocellular, layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus are correlated with changes in both brain size and ecological variables (diet and social group size). Given the known functions of the parvocellular pathway, these results suggest that the relatively large brains of frugivorous species are products of selection on the ability to perceive and select fruits using specific visual cues such as colour. The separate correlation between group size and visual brain evolution, on the other hand, may indicate the visual basis of social information processing in the primate brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.1998.0523

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barton, R. A.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Barton, R. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1998-10-22
Volume
265
Issue
1409
Pages
1933-1937
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2029305204
Cited by
301
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 22
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
primate brain evolution, brain size, lateral geniculate nucleus, parvocellular pathway, magnocellular pathway, primary visual cortex, frugivory, diet, social group size, color vision, social information processing, neural specialization
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Constitution, Brain, Biological Evolution, Food Supply, Geniculate Bodies, Models, Neurological, Organ Size, Primates, Social Behavior, Species Specificity, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review