Cited by 550Primate Behavior and EcologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Primates, brains and ecology

Clutton‐Brock, T. H., Harvey, Paul H.·1980·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

The paper examines systematic relationships among primates between brain size (relative to body size) and differences in ecology and social system. Marked differences in relative brain size exist between families. These are correlated with inter‐family differences in body size and home range size. Variation in comparative brain size within families is related to diet (folivores have comparatively smaller brains than frugivores), home range size and possibly also to breeding system. The adaptive significance of these relationships is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1980.tb01430.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Home range size has an influence on brain structures in primates.

    “because home range size has been shown to have an influence on brain structures in primates (Clutton-Brock & Harvey, 1980;Sawaguchi, 1990)”

    From Baboons (Papio anubis) living in larger social groups have bigger brains. (2021) · cites this paper as Clutton-Brock & Harvey, 1980

  • The foraging hypothesis posits that dietary complexity, indexed by field reports of dietary breadth and reliance on fruit, was the primary driver of primate cognitive evolution.

    “The foraging hypothesis posits that dietary complexity, indexed by field reports of dietary breadth and reliance on fruit (a spatiotemporally distributed resource), was the primary driver of primate cognitive evolution (151-154).”

    From The evolution of self-control. (2014) · cites this paper as [152]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clutton‐Brock, T. H., & Harvey, P. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-03
Volume
190
Issue
3
Pages
309-323
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W2114458610
Cited by
550
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
  • RCIN (Digital Repository of the Scientifics Institutes) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
primate brain size, relative brain size, primate ecology, social systems, diet, folivory, frugivory, home range size, body size, breeding system, comparative neuroanatomy, adaptive significance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review