Cited by 257Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Differential effects of word length and visual contrast in the fusiform and lingual gyri during

Open access
Mechelli, Andrea, Humphreys, Glyn W., Mayall, Kate, Olson, Andrew, Price, Cathy J.·2000·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Previous studies have shown differential responses in the fusiform and lingual gyri during reading and suggested that the former is engaged in processing local features of visual stimuli and the latter is engaged in global shape processing. We used positron emission tomography in order to investigate how these regions are modulated by two common variables in reading: word length (three, six and nine letters) and perceptive similarity to the background (high and low contrast). Increasing both word length and visual contrast had a positive monotonic effect on activation in the bilateral fusiform. However, in the lingual gyrus, activation increased with increasing word length but decreased with increasing contrast. On the basis of previous studies, we suggest that (i) increasing word length increases the demands on both local feature and global shape processing, but (ii) increasing visual contrast increases the demands on local feature processing while decreasing the demands on global shape processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2000.1229

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mechelli, A., Humphreys, G. W., Mayall, K., Olson, A., & Price, C. J.
Affiliations
  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Mechelli, Andrea
  • Price, Cathy J.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2000-09-22
Volume
267
Issue
1455
Pages
1909-1913
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2216515421
Cited by
257
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (051067)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
word length, visual contrast, fusiform gyrus, lingual gyrus, reading, visual word recognition, brain activation
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Visual Cortex, Contrast Sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review