Cited by 139

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolving the selfish herd: emergence of distinct aggregating strategies in an individual-based model

Wood, Andrew J, Ackland, Graeme J·2007·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

From zebra to starlings, herring and even tadpoles, many creatures move in an organized group. The emergent behaviour arises from simple underlying movement rules, but the evolutionary pressure which favours these rules has not been conclusively identified. Various explanations exist for the advantage to the individual of group formation: reduction of predation risk; increased foraging efficiency or reproductive success. Here, we adopt an individual-based model for group formation and subject it to simulated predation and foraging; the haploid individuals evolve via a genetic algorithm based on their relative success under such pressure. Our work suggests that flock or herd formation is likely to be driven by predator avoidance. Individual fitness in the model is strongly dependent on the presence of other phenotypes, such that two distinct types of evolved group can be produced by the same predation or foraging conditions, each stable against individual mutation. We draw analogies with multiple Nash equilibria theory of iterated games to explain and categorize these behaviours. Our model is sufficient to capture the complex behaviour of dynamic collective groups, yet is flexible enough to manifest evolutionary behaviour.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2007.0306

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.2331/suisan.48.1081 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.physa.2005.11.041 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF00300351 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0040-5809(71)90012-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3065 · DOI
  6. 10.1006/anbe.1994.1057 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF00397579 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.09.019 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s10164-004-0124-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80681-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2449 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1972.tb00852.x · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.09.009 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80109-X · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1051 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1971.tb05196.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1974.tb04385.x · DOI
  18. Oboshi T, 2002, Artificial life, 386
  19. 10.1126/science.284.5411.99 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/1543482 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/978-94-011-1578-0_12 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.11.035 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/37402.37406 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1007/s10710-005-7620-3 · DOI
  25. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1733 · DOI
  26. Tien J.H, 2004, Dynamics of fish shoals: identifying key decision rules, Evol. Ecol. Res, 6, 555
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1226 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.12.025 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wood, A. J., & Ackland, G. J.
Affiliations
School of Physics, SUPA, The University of EdinburghJames Clerk Maxwell Building, The King's Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ,UK
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2007-05
Volume
274
Issue
1618
Pages
1637-1642
ISSN
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
Cited by
139
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review