The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contraction type influences the human ability to use the available torque capacity of skeletal muscle during explosive efforts
Open accessAbstract
The influence of contraction type on the human ability to use the torque capacity of skeletal muscle during explosive efforts has not been documented. Fourteen male participants completed explosive voluntary contractions of the knee extensors in four separate conditions: concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC); and isometric at two knee angles (101°, ISO101 and 155°, ISO155). In each condition, torque was measured at 25 ms intervals up to 150 ms from torque onset, and then normalized to the maximum voluntary torque (MVT) specific to that joint angle and angular velocity. Explosive voluntary torque after 50 ms in each condition was also expressed as a percentage of torque generated after 50 ms during a supramaximal 300 Hz electrically evoked octet in the same condition. Explosive voluntary torque normalized to MVT was more than 60 per cent larger in CON than any other condition after the initial 25 ms. The percentage of evoked torque expressed after 50 ms of the explosive voluntary contractions was also greatest in CON (ANOVA; p < 0.001), suggesting higher concentric volitional activation. This was confirmed by greater agonist electromyography normalized to M max (recorded during the explosive voluntary contractions) in CON. These results provide novel evidence that the ability to use the muscle's torque capacity explosively is influenced by contraction type, with concentric contractions being more conducive to explosive performance due to a more effective neural strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RFD is influenced by the muscle group(s) and joint angle(s) at which it is measured.
“as RFD is known to be influenced by the muscle group(s) and joint angle(s) at which it is measured (Bellumori et al. 2011; de Ruiter et al. 2004; Tillin et al. 2012a).”
From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Tillin et al. 2012a
The Discussion (§4b) reports that knee angle affected explosive torque production, supporting the joint-angle part of the claim. The study examines knee extension at different angles, but does not compare RFD across muscle groups, so it does not support that part. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn knee extensor experiments, baseline noise ranges of <0.1% MVC force have been observed with custom-built dynamometers incorporating a strain gauge load cell compared with >1% MVC force with a commercial isokinetic dynamometer.
“For example, in knee extensor experiments baseline noise ranges of <0.1 % MVC force have been observed with custom-built dynamometers incorporating a strain gauge load cell (de Ruiter et al. 2006; Folland et al. 2014) compared with >1 % MVC force with a commercial isokinetic dynamometer (Tillin et al. 2012a).”
From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Tillin et al. 2012a
The Methods (2. Methods; page unavailable) describe knee-extensor experiments using a Con-Trex dynamometer. They report criteria for acceptable baseline torque but do not report a baseline noise range or establish that it exceeded 1% MVC force. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEarly-phase RFD can be small, e.g., 2-12% of MVC force.
“Early-phase (first 25–50 ms) RFD appears important for performance (de Ruiter et al. 2006; Tillin et al. 2010) and injury avoidance (Domire et al. 2011; Krosshaug et al. 2007), yet can be small, e.g., 2–12 % of MVC force (Tillin et al. 2012a).”
From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Tillin et al. 2012a
The greater normalised RFD in concentric contractions appeared attributable to neural mechanisms, as authors measured a greater voluntary:evoked torque ratio and EMG amplitude during the concentric condition.
“This appeared to be attributable to neural mechanisms as the authors also measured a greater voluntary:evoked torque ratio and EMG amplitude during the concentric condition.”
From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Tillin et al. 2012a
Commercial isokinetic dynamometers are often noisier than strain gauges.
“Commercial isokinetic dynamometers are often noisier than strain gauges (another reason for using custom-built dynamometers; see Fig. 6).”
From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Tillin et al. 2012a
The Methods section describes torque signals from a Con-Trex dynamometer and how they were filtered, but does not compare their noise with strain-gauge measurements. Searches for strain gauges, noise, and custom-built dynamometers found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Studies utilising automated threshold methods have often employed relatively high thresholds, likely due to the use of commercially available dynamometers that tend to have high inherent noise.
“As can be seen from the values above, studies utilising automated threshold methods (including absolute and relative) have often employed relatively high thresholds, likely due to the use of commercially available dynamometers that tend to have high inherent noise (noise range of ~5 Nm or >1 % MVC; Fig. 6c) (Tillin et al. 2012a) in comparison to custom-built dynamometers (<0.1 Nm; Fig. 6d) (de Ru”
From Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations (2016) · cites this paper as Tillin et al. 2012a
The Methods (page unavailable) identify a Con-Trex dynamometer and describe baseline-torque criteria, but do not report its inherent noise as approximately 5 Nm or greater than 1% MVC. They define torque onset using a derivative rather than an automated threshold. Searches for noise, thresholds, and baseline fluctuations found no passage linking dynamometer noise to the relatively high thresholds claimed. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Andersen, L. L., & Aagaard, P. (2006) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-005-0070-z · Cited by 657
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00283.2002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00230.2004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181be9c7e · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.6.2249 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1990.69.6.2215 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.037 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00867932 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.1.40 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00421-008-0750-6 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.6.2714 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0958067099018953 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jeb.038588 · DOI
- 10.1139/y02-127 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008923 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/ajpcell.1980.239.3.C98 · DOI
- 10.1002/mus.21885 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1123/jab.26.1.62 · DOI
- 10.1123/jab.18.3.207 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.024 · DOI
- 10.1123/jab.22.4.264 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/29380.29864 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb00241.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00361541 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00221-002-1129-2 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.6.2628 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00626764 · DOI
- 10.1002/mus.1053 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00421-003-1025-x · DOI
- 10.2165/00007256-200636080-00001 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations
Maffiuletti, N. A., Aagaard, P., Blazevich, A. J., Folland, J., Tillin, N., & Duchateau, J. (2016) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-016-3346-6 · Cited by 1,424
Self-citationHuman capacity for explosive force production: Neural and contractile determinants
Folland, J. P., Buckthorpe, M. W., & Hannah, R. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.12131 · Cited by 327
Self-citationTillin, N. A., & Folland, J. P. (2014) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-013-2781-x · Cited by 140
Self-citationResource allocation in mammalian systems
Baghdassarian, H. M., & Lewis, N. E. (2024) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108305 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Tillin, N. A., Pain, M. T. G., & Folland, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Tillin, Neale A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2012-01-18
- Volume
- 279
- Issue
- 1736
- Pages
- 2106-2115
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC3321696
- OpenAlex
- W2165396203
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Keywords
- torque capacity, skeletal muscle, concentric contraction, eccentric contraction, isometric contraction, knee extensors, electrical stimulation, neuromuscular activation, electromyography
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Electric Stimulation, Electromyography, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Knee Joint, Male, Muscle Contraction, Range of Motion, Articular, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review