Cited by 117Animal Ecology and Behavior StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Dietary characterization of terrestrial mammals

Open access
Pineda-Munoz, Silvia, Alroy, John·2014·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Understanding the feeding behaviour of the species that make up any ecosystem is essential for designing further research. Mammals have been studied intensively, but the criteria used for classifying their diets are far from being standardized. We built a database summarizing the dietary preferences of terrestrial mammals using published data regarding their stomach contents. We performed multivariate analyses in order to set up a standardized classification scheme. Ideally, food consumption percentages should be used instead of qualitative classifications. However, when highly detailed information is not available we propose classifying animals based on their main feeding resources. They should be classified as generalists when none of the feeding resources constitute over 50% of the diet. The term ‘omnivore’ should be avoided because it does not communicate all the complexity inherent to food choice. Moreover, the so-called omnivore diets actually involve several distinctive adaptations. Our dataset shows that terrestrial mammals are generally highly specialized and that some degree of food mixing may even be required for most species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2014.1173

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding and accessing accurate information about the feeding behavior of different species can provide data for ecomorphology studies and food-web modeling.

    “Understanding and accessing accurate information about the feeding behavior of different species can provide data for ecomorphology studies and food-web modeling (Pineda-Munoz and Alroy 2014).”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Pineda-Munoz and Alroy 2014

  • Analysis of stomach contents allows for a more accurate evaluation of consumed items compared to fecal analyses, given that the items can be better identified since they have been exposed to much less digestive action, and easily-digestible foods may not be present in feces.

    “Another alternative for diet assessment is the analysis of stomach contents, a more invasive method since it requires deceased individuals; however, it allows for a more accurate evaluation of consumed items compared to fecal analyses, given that the items can be better identified since they have been exposed to much less digestive action, and easily-digestible foods may not be present in feces (B”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Pineda-Munoz and Alroy 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Palmqvist P Gröcke DR Arribas A Fariña RA 2003 Paleoecological reconstruction of a lower Pleistocene large mammal community using biogeochemical (δ13C, δ15N, δ18O, Sr:Zn) and ecomorphological approaches. Paleobiology 29, 205– 229. (10.1666/0094-8373(2003)029<0205:PROALP>2.0.CO;2) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pineda-Munoz, S., & Alroy, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2014-08-22
Volume
281
Issue
1789
Pages
20141173
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2082373753
Cited by
117
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
terrestrial mammals, diet classification, feeding behaviour, stomach contents, food choice, dietary specialization, generalist diet, omnivory, food mixing
MeSH terms
Animals, Feces, Feeding Behavior, Fruit, Invertebrates, Mammals, Seeds, Multivariate Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Ecosystem, Gastrointestinal Tract, Herbivory, Carnivory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review