Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New approaches to the Moon's isotopic crisis

Melosh, H. J.·2014·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Recent comparisons of the isotopic compositions of the Earth and the Moon show that, unlike nearly every other body known in the Solar System, our satellite's isotopic ratios are nearly identical to the Earth's for nearly every isotopic system. The Moon's chemical make-up, however, differs from the Earth's in its low volatile content and perhaps in the elevated abundance of oxidized iron. This surprising situation is not readily explained by current impact models of the Moon's origin and offers a major clue to the Moon's formation, if we only could understand it properly. Current ideas to explain this similarity range from assuming an impactor with the same isotopic composition as the Earth to postulating a pure ice impactor that completely vaporized upon impact. Several recent proposals follow from the suggestion that the Earth–Moon system may have lost a great deal of angular momentum during early resonant interactions. The isotopic constraint may be the most stringent test yet for theories of the Moon's origin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2013.0168

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00395.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1029/2005JE002608 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-1-4612-6167-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Taylor SR, 1982, Planetary science: a lunar perspective.
  5. Wänke H, 1986, Origin of the Moon, 649
  6. 10.1016/0016-7037(91)90168-5 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0031-9201(98)00082-X · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00140-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.1231530 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/0012-821X(70)90162-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0031-9201(72)90060-X · doi:10.1016/0031-9201(72)90060-x
  12. Wood JA, 1977, Planetary satellites, 512
  13. Urey HC, 1952, The planets: their origin and development.
  14. 10.1016/0019-1035(78)90019-2 · DOI
  15. 10.1029/JB084iB03p00999 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/science.228.4701.877 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/0019-1035(78)90057-X · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/0019-1035(75)90070-6 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cameron AGW, 1976, In 7th Lunar Science Conf., 120
  20. Benz W, 1986, Origin of the Moon, 617
  21. Kipp ME, 1986, Origin of the Moon, 643
  22. Stevenson DJ, 1984, In Proc. Conf. on the Origin of the Moon, Kona, HI, 14–16 October 1984, 60
  23. Melosh HJ, 1986, Origin of the Moon, 621
  24. 10.1146/annurev.ea.15.050187.001415 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.10.011 · DOI
  26. McFarlane EA, 1989, In 19th Lunar and Planetary Science Conf., 593
  27. 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90088-6 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1126/science.1063037 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1126/science.1251117 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00132-8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00131-X · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(95)00131-x
  32. 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00189-6 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/nature05927 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/nature06428 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1038/ngeo1429 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/nature11507 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1126/science.1133355 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/nature10399 · DOI
  39. 10.1126/science.1216351 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb00734.x · DOI
  41. Belbruno E, 2005, Where did the Moon come from??, Astrophys. J., 129, 1724
  42. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb01009.x · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1029/2012JE004082 · DOI
  44. 10.1029/2010GL045330 · DOI
  45. Kurosawa K, 2013, In 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conf., 2537
  46. 10.1086/499032 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/mnras/168.3.603 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Tennekes H, 1972, A first course in turbulence., 10.7551/mitpress/3014.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1086/177328 · doi:10.1086/177328
  50. 10.1086/166760 · DOI
  51. Wolbeck J, 2010, Origin of the Moon: Icy Impactor Model (IIM), Meteorit. Planet. Sci. Suppl.
  52. 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.07.021 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1126/science.1225542 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1086/300312 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1098/rstl.1879.0073 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/35001516 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 47

Metadata

Authors
Melosh, H. J.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2014-09-13
Volume
372
Issue
2024
Pages
20130168
ISSN
  • 1364-503X
  • 1471-2962
Cited by
47
References
3
Language
en
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New approaches to the Moon's isotopic crisis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.2013.0168
The paper
Melosh, H. J. (2014). New approaches to the Moon's isotopic crisis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0168

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.