Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 426

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Some cognitive effects of frontal-lobe lesions in man

Milner, Brenda Atkinson·1982·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences

Abstract

The study of patients undergoing unilateral frontal-lobe excisions for the relief of focal epilepsy has revealed specific cognitive disorders that appear against a background of normal functioning on many intellectual, perceptual and memory tasks. Lesions that invade the frontal eye field cause subtle impairments of voluntary oculomotor control, which reveal themselves as an inability to suppress an initial glance at a potentially distracting stimulus. After frontal lobectomy in either hemisphere, deficits are found quite consistently on motor-differentiation tasks (Konorski 1972) in which the subject must learn to produce different responses to different, randomly presented, environmental signals. More directly related to the concept of planning are those sequential tasks in which the subject is free to choose his own order of responding, but must not make the same response twice. Here the left frontal lobe plays the major role, a finding consistent with the notion of left-hemisphere dominance for the programming of voluntary actions. In contrast, the right frontal lobe appears to be more critically involved in monitoring the temporal sequence of externally ordered events, although the verbal or non-verbal nature of the stimuli remains a relevant factor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1982.0083

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 426

Metadata

Authors
Milner, B. A.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
Published
1982-06-25
Volume
298
Issue
1089
Pages
211-226
ISSN
  • 0080-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-0280
OpenAlex
W2037140536
Cited by
426
References
1
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.