Cited by 658Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

A selective review of selective attention research from the past century

Driver, Jon·2001·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Research on attention is concerned with selective processing of incoming sensory information. To some extent, our awareness of the world depends on what we choose to attend, not merely on the stimulation entering our senses. British psychologists have made substantial contributions to this topic in the past century. Celebrated examples include Donald Broadbent's filter theory of attention, which set the agenda for most subsequent work; and Anne Treisman's revisions of this account, and her later feature-integration theory. More recent contributions include Alan Allport's prescient emphasis on the relevance of neuroscience data, and John Duncan's integration of such data with psychological theory. An idiosyncratic but roughly chronological review of developments is presented, some practical and clinical implications are briefly sketched, and future directions suggested. One of the biggest changes in the field has been the increasing interplay between psychology and neuroscience, which promises much for the future. A related change has been the realization that selection attention is best thought of as a broad topic, encompassing a range of selective issues, rather than as a single explanatory process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000712601162103

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Information on which we decide to focus our attention will be remembered better.

    “and that information on which we decide to focus our attention (e.g., because we find it important) will be remembered better (Aly & Turk-Browne, 2017;Driver, 2001).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Driver, J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Driver, Jon
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-02
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
53-78
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W2119291948
Cited by
658
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 25
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
selective attention, Broadbent, feature integration theory
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain, United Kingdom, Psychological Theory, Psychology, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review