The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation
Open accessAbstract
Movement imitation requires a complex set of mechanisms that map an observed movement of a teacher onto one's own movement apparatus. Relevant problems include movement recognition, pose estimation, pose tracking, body correspondence, coordinate transformation from external to egocentric space, matching of observed against previously learned movement, resolution of redundant degrees–of–freedom that are unconstrained by the observation, suitable movement representations for imitation, modularization of motor control, etc. All of these topics by themselves are active research problems in computational and neurobiological sciences, such that their combination into a complete imitation system remains a daunting undertaking—indeed, one could argue that we need to understand the complete perception–action loop. As a strategy to untangle the complexity of imitation, this paper will examine imitation purely from a computational point of view, i.e. we will review statistical and mathematical approaches that have been suggested for tackling parts of the imitation problem, and discuss their merits, disadvantages and underlying principles. Given the focus on action recognition of other contributions in this special issue, this paper will primarily emphasize the motor side of imitation, assuming that a perceptual system has already identified important features of a demonstrated movement and created their corresponding spatial information. Based on the formalization of motor control in terms of control policies and their associated performance criteria, useful taxonomies of imitation learning can be generated that clarify different approaches and future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking
Arulampalam, M. S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., & Clapp, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.978374 · Cited by 11,502
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,080
Play, Dreams And Imitation In Childhood
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009698 · Cited by 5,360
Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0 · Cited by 4,870
Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading
Gallese, V (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01262-5 · Cited by 3,201
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01260-0 · Cited by 2,858
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control
Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4 · Cited by 2,260
Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control
Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(98)00066-5 · Cited by 2,151
Cited by
A survey of robot learning from demonstration
Argall, B. D., Chernova, S., Veloso, M., & Browning, B. (2009) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.024 · Cited by 3,227
A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1238 · Cited by 1,228
Imitation Learning: A Survey of Learning Methods
Hussein, A., Gaber, M. M., Elyan, E., & Jayne, C. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3054912 · Cited by 1,060
Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrations
Rajeswaran, A., Kumar, V., Gupta, A., Vezzani, G., Schulman, J., Todorov, E., & Levine, S. (2018) · Robotics: Science and Systems XIV · doi:10.15607/rss.2018.xiv.049 · Cited by 847
Learning Stable Nonlinear Dynamical Systems With Gaussian Mixture Models
Khansari-Zadeh, S. M., & Billard, A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2011.2159412 · Cited by 771
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaal, S., Ijspeert, A., & Billard, A.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2003-02-17
- Volume
- 358
- Issue
- 1431
- Pages
- 537-547
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2130726249
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2002.1258
- The paper
- Schaal, S., Ijspeert, A., & Billard, A. (2003). Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.