The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes
Open accessAbstract
Biomes are areas of vegetation that are characterized by the same life–form. Traditional definitions of biomes have also included either geographical or climatic descriptors. This approach describes a wide range of biomes that can be correlated with characteristic climatic conditions, or climatic envelopes. The application of remote sensing technology to the frequent observation of biomes has led to a move away from the often subjective definition of biomes to one that is objective. Carefully characterized observations of life–form, by satellite, have been used to reconsider biome classification and their climatic envelopes. Five major tree biomes can be recognized by satellites based on leaf longevity and morphology: needleleaf evergreen, broadleaf evergreen, needleleaf deciduous, broadleaf cold deciduous and broadleaf drought deciduous. Observations indicate that broadleaf drought deciduous vegetation grades substantially into broadleaf evergreen vegetation. The needleleaf deciduous biome occurs in the world's coldest climates, where summer drought and therefore a drought deciduous biome are absent. Traditional biome definitions are quite static, implying no change in their life–form composition with time, within their particular climatic envelopes. However, this is not the case where there has been global ingress of grasslands and croplands into forested vegetation. The global spread of grasses, a new super–biome, was probably initiated 30–45 Myr ago by an increase in global aridity, and was driven by the natural spread of the disturbances of fire and animal grazing. These disturbances have been further extended over the Holocene era by human activities that have increased the land areas available for domestic animal grazing and for growing crops. The current situation is that grasses now occur in most, if not all biomes, and in many areas they dominate and define the biome. Croplands are also increasing, defining a new and relatively recent component to the grassland super–biome. In the case of both grassland and croplands, various forms of disturbance, particularly frequent disturbance, lead to continued range extensions of the biomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present
Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E., & Billups, K. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1059412 · Cited by 10,458
Holdridge, L. R. (1967) · Cited by 2,264
New, M., Hulme, M., & Jones, P. (2000) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<2217:rtcstc>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,097
Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992
Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (1999) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb900046 · Cited by 2,074
Climate and Plant Distribution
Eyre, S. R., & Woodward, F. I. (1988) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/633873 · Cited by 1,823
Self-citationBond, W. J., & van Wilgen, B. W. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,062
Global distribution of C3and C4vegetation: Carbon cycle implications
Still, C. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J., & DeFries, R. S. (2003) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2001gb001807 · Cited by 906
Bond, W. J., & van Wilgen, B. W. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1499-5 · Cited by 840
Evolutionary History of the Grasses
Kellogg, E. A. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.125.3.1198 · Cited by 803
Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-6169 · Cited by 632
Cited by
Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., & Bardgett, R. D. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x · Cited by 1,431
Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale
Crisp, M. D., Arroyo, M. T. K., Cook, L. G., Gandolfo, M. A., Jordan, G. J., McGlone, M. S., Weston, P. H., Westoby, M., Wilf, P., & Linder, H. P. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07764 · Cited by 734
Tropical grassy biomes: misunderstood, neglected, and under threat
Parr, C. L., Lehmann, C. E. R., Bond, W. J., Hoffmann, W. A., & Andersen, A. N. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.004 · Cited by 603
Sonenshine, D. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15030478 · Cited by 510
Staver, A. C., Archibald, S., & Levin, S. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/10-1684.1 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodward, F. I., Lomas, M. R., & Kelly, C. K.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2004-10-29
- Volume
- 359
- Issue
- 1450
- Pages
- 1465-1476
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2100622042
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2004.1525
- The paper
- Woodward, F. I., Lomas, M. R., & Kelly, C. K. (2004). Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.