Cited by 1,941Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisPlant and soil sciencesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 172 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence

Open access
Pretty, Jules·2008·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Concerns about sustainability in agricultural systems centre on the need to develop technologies and practices that do not have adverse effects on environmental goods and services, are accessible to and effective for farmers, and lead to improvements in food productivity. Despite great progress in agricultural productivity in the past half-century, with crop and livestock productivity strongly driven by increased use of fertilizers, irrigation water, agricultural machinery, pesticides and land, it would be over-optimistic to assume that these relationships will remain linear in the future. New approaches are needed that will integrate biological and ecological processes into food production, minimize the use of those non-renewable inputs that cause harm to the environment or to the health of farmers and consumers, make productive use of the knowledge and skills of farmers, so substituting human capital for costly external inputs, and make productive use of people's collective capacities to work together to solve common agricultural and natural resource problems, such as for pest, watershed, irrigation, forest and credit management. These principles help to build important capital assets for agricultural systems: natural; social; human; physical; and financial capital. Improving natural capital is a central aim, and dividends can come from making the best use of the genotypes of crops and animals and the ecological conditions under which they are grown or raised. Agricultural sustainability suggests a focus on both genotype improvements through the full range of modern biological approaches and improved understanding of the benefits of ecological and agronomic management, manipulation and redesign. The ecological management of agroecosystems that addresses energy flows, nutrient cycling, population-regulating mechanisms and system resilience can lead to the redesign of agriculture at a landscape scale. Sustainable agriculture outcomes can be positive for food productivity, reduced pesticide use and carbon balances. Significant challenges, however, remain to develop national and international policies to support the wider emergence of more sustainable forms of agricultural production across both industrialized and developing countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2007.2163

Cites

172 of 172 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 175 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Abramovitz J, 1997, State of the world
  2. Benton T, 1998, Fairness and futurity
  3. Bunch R, 1999, Fertile ground: the impact of participatory watershed management, 32
  4. Byerlee D, 1998, Impacts of rice research
  5. Cato M.P & Hooper W.D. 1979 Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press (revised H. B. Ash.).
  6. Conway G.R The doubly green revolution. 1997 London UK:Penguin.
  7. Daily G. 1997 Washington DC:Island Press.
  8. 10.1023/A:1009790722044 · DOI
  9. Delgado C, 1999, IFPRI brief 61
  10. de Freitas H, 1999, Fertile ground: the impacts of participatory watershed development
  11. Eurodiet, 2001, The Eurodiet reports and proceedings, Publ. Health Nutr, 4, 265
  12. Gallagher K, 2005, The pesticide detox
  13. Gliessman S.R, 2005, The earthscan reader in sustainable agriculture
  14. Goodman D& Watts M.J. 1997 London UK; New York NY:Routledge.
  15. Herren H, 2005, The pesticide detox
  16. Hesiod 1988 Theogony works and days. Oxford World's Classics. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
  17. Kenmore P.E, 1984, Population regulation of the brown planthopper within rice fields in The Philippines, J. Plant Prot. Tropics, 1, 19
  18. Khush G.S, 1998, Feeding the world population of more than eight billion people
  19. McNeely J.A& Scherr S.J Ecoagriculture. 2003 Washington DC:Island Press.
  20. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) Ecosystems and well-being. 2005 Washington DC:Island Press.
  21. Norse D Ji L Leshan J& Zheng Z Environmental costs of rice production in China. 2001 Bethesda MD:Aileen Press.
  22. NRC Our common journey: transition towards sustainability. 2000 Washington DC:Board on Sustainable development Policy Division National Research Council National Academy Press.
  23. Odum E.P, 2004, New dimensions in agroecology
  24. Orr D Ecological literacy. 1992 Albany NY:SUNY Press.
  25. Pretty J. 1995 London UK; Washington DC:Earthscan; National Academy Press.
  26. Pretty J, 2005, The pesticide detox
  27. Röling N.G& Wagemakers M.A.E. 1997 Cambridge UK:Cambridge University Press.
  28. Shennan C, 2005, The pesticide detox
  29. Sherwood S, 2005, The pesticide detox
  30. Stout B.A, 1998, Feeding the world population of more than eight billion people
  31. Uphoff N, 1998, Social capital: a multiperspective approach

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,941

Metadata

Authors
Pretty, J.
Affiliations
University of Essex (GB)
Corresponding author
Pretty, Jules
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2007-07-25
Volume
363
Issue
1491
Pages
447-465
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2124217459
Cited by
1,941
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 159 · 2025: 178 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 110 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 76
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
sustainable agriculture, agroecosystems, natural capital, social capital, human capital, financial capital, physical capital, ecological management, nutrient cycling, system resilience, food productivity, pesticide reduction, carbon balance, farmer knowledge, agricultural policy, environmental goods and services
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Conservation of Natural Resources, Developing Countries, Environment, Food Supply, Humans, Pesticides, Ecosystem, Crops, Agricultural, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review