Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,215

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects

Open access
Thornton, Philip K.·2010·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The livestock sector globally is highly dynamic. In developing countries, it is evolving in response to rapidly increasing demand for livestock products. In developed countries, demand for livestock products is stagnating, while many production systems are increasing their efficiency and environmental sustainability. Historical changes in the demand for livestock products have been largely driven by human population growth, income growth and urbanization and the production response in different livestock systems has been associated with science and technology as well as increases in animal numbers. In the future, production will increasingly be affected by competition for natural resources, particularly land and water, competition between food and feed and by the need to operate in a carbon-constrained economy. Developments in breeding, nutrition and animal health will continue to contribute to increasing potential production and further efficiency and genetic gains. Livestock production is likely to be increasingly affected by carbon constraints and environmental and animal welfare legislation. Demand for livestock products in the future could be heavily moderated by socio-economic factors such as human health concerns and changing socio-cultural values. There is considerable uncertainty as to how these factors will play out in different regions of the world in the coming decades.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2010.0134

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Bruinsma J., 2003, World agriculture: towards 2015/2030, an FAO perspective.
  2. 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00076-2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Delgado C., 2005, Grassland: a global resource, 29, 10.3920/9789086865512_003 · doi:10.3920/9789086865512_003
  4. 10.1007/s10806-006-9010-0 · doi:10.1007/s10806-006-9010-0
  5. Dijkman J., 2009, Innovation capacity and the elusive livestock revolution, LINK News Bulletin
  6. 10.1017/S0021859608007703 · DOI
  7. FAO, 2006, World agriculture: towards 2030/2050.
  8. FAO, 2007, Int. technical conf. on animal genetic resources for food and agriculture
  9. 10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00365.x · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00365.x
  10. GEO4, 2007, Global Environment Outlook 4, Environment for Development.
  11. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72102-6 · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72102-6
  12. 10.3168/jds.2008-1646 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Herrero M., 2009, Drivers of change in crop–livestock systems and their potential impacts on agro-ecosystems services and human well-being to 2030. Study commissioned by the CGIAR Systemwide Livestock Programme (SLP).
  14. 10.1126/science.1183725 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1126/science.1158390 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1079/ASC200689 · doi:10.1079/asc200689
  17. 10.1126/science.1129134 · DOI
  18. Kitalyi A., 2005, Livestock and wealth creation: improving the husbandry of animals kept by resource-poor people in developing countries, 13
  19. Kristjanson P., 2004, Pathways out of poverty in western Kenya and the role of livestock.
  20. 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.003 · DOI
  21. Lawrence A. B., 2009, Fish welfare
  22. Lawrence A. B., 2009, Profiting from animal welfare: an animal-based perspective., Oxford Farming Conf. 2009
  23. Lawrence A. B., 2004, Breeding and animal welfare: practical and theoretical advantages of multi-trait selection, Anim. Welfare, 13, S191, 10.1017/S0962728600014585 · doi:10.1017/s0962728600014585
  24. Leakey R., 2009, Agriculture at a crossroads, 145
  25. 10.1126/science.1173880 · DOI
  26. MA, 2005, The millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios,
  27. 10.1787/9789264104143-en · DOI · Paper page
  28. McIntire J., 1992, Crop-livestock interactions in sub-Saharan Africa.
  29. Mude A.. 2009 Index-based livestock insurance for northern Kenya's arid and semi-arid lands: the Marsabit pilot p. 14. Nairobi Kenya: Project document ILRI. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1844758
  30. 10.1093/jn/133.11.3941S · DOI · Paper page
  31. NRC (National Research Council), 2009, Emerging technologies to benefit farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
  32. Otte J., 2005, Poverty and livestock agriculture. WAAP Book of the Year 2005, 281–296.
  33. Peden D., 2007, Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture
  34. Perry B., 2009, Global livestock disease dynamics over the last quarter century: drivers, impacts and implications.
  35. 10.1007/978-1-4020-4906-4_9 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nature08238 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Rosegrant M. W., 2002, Global water outlook to 2025, averting an impending crisis. A 2020 vision for food, agriculture, and the environment initiative
  38. Rosegrant M. W., 2009, Agriculture at a crossroads, 307
  39. Scott N. R., 2006, Impact of nanoscale technologies in animal management
  40. Simm G., 1998, Genetic improvement of cattle and sheep.
  41. Simm G., 2004, Yields of farmed species: constraints and opportunities in the 21st century, 123
  42. Smith C., 1984, Rates of genetic change in farm livestock, Res. Dev. Agric., 1, 79
  43. Smith P., 2007, Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
  44. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2184 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Speiser B., 2008, Nano-particles in organic production? Issues and opinions.
  46. Steinfeld H., 2006, Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options.
  47. 10.1007/s11027-009-9210-9 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Thornton P. K., The potential for reduced emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
  49. Thornton P. K., 2006, Mapping climate vulnerability and poverty in Africa.
  50. 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Vallat B., 2005, Antibiotic use in animal production and consequences on food safety.
  52. 10.1017/S1751731109990991 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Van Vuuren D. P., 2009, Agriculture at a crossroads, 255
  54. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.03.006 · DOI
  55. World Bank, 2009, Minding the stock: bringing public policy to bear on livestock sector development.

Cited by

See all 2,215

Metadata

Authors
Thornton, P. K.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2010-09-27
Volume
365
Issue
1554
Pages
2853-2867
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W1997744353
Cited by
2,215
References
0
FWCI
40.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134
The paper
Thornton, P. K. (2010). Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.